Live data from Hacker News

Goodbye Brave

arunmozhi.in

1–10 of 252 posts

Re: Goodbye Brave

#2
Seems a little ironic to call out a piece of software whose literal job it is to connect to the internet for... Connecting to the internet.

Tongue in cheek aside, I don't know much about Brave - is there some specific reason that it needs an always-on server to call home to?

Re: Goodbye Brave

#3
The thing I don't understand about Brave users is that they are essentially using Chromium with a bunch of extra bloat added. Wouldn't it make more sense to just use Chromium with the extensions that you want and need?

Re: Goodbye Brave

#5
I think this is due to Brave proxying some Google requests through their own servers, because otherwise the same people would complain that a Google server is being contacted.

> I am thinking of going back to [Chromium] with the usual extensions like Ghostery, AdBlock+

> [Brave's] amazing ad-blocking and tracker protection

If you just need an adblocker, sure. At this point everone should have heard of uBlock Origin.

Re: Goodbye Brave

#6
Hi author, if you're here on HN please consider ditching sketchy extensions like Ghostery (sells your user data) and Adblock+ (participates in paid bypass of "acceptable ads" program) for the open-source and user-focused uBlock Origin (https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock).

Also, if you haven't tried Firefox since the quantum days come back and give it another try.

Re: Goodbye Brave

#7

The thing I don't understand about Brave users is that they are essentially using Chromium with a bunch of extra bloat added. Wouldn't it make more sense to just use Chromium with the extensions that you want and need?

It does include some hardening against fingerprinting. In contrast to Ungoogled Chromium it's properly compiled and can be updated easily.

Re: Goodbye Brave

#8

The thing I don't understand about Brave users is that they are essentially using Chromium with a bunch of extra bloat added. Wouldn't it make more sense to just use Chromium with the extensions that you want and need?

It has a pretty good adblocker integrated, which puts it ahead of chromium in terms of ad blocking. you can use the engine outside of browsers as well. It also has a decent working sync that doesn't require google services if you don't use their google services. It used to be worse, when it was still CEF based.

Re: Goodbye Brave

#9

The thing I don't understand about Brave users is that they are essentially using Chromium with a bunch of extra bloat added. Wouldn't it make more sense to just use Chromium with the extensions that you want and need?

Chrome does not block ads on mobile or support extensions that can

Re: Goodbye Brave

#10

The thing I don't understand about Brave users is that they are essentially using Chromium with a bunch of extra bloat added. Wouldn't it make more sense to just use Chromium with the extensions that you want and need?

Ungoogled Chromium = no auto-updates, extensions hassle, few users so you can be fingerprinted
Post reply on HN