21–30 of 104 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Striving for keeping the homogeneous culture that has existed for centuries and ejecting those who do not accept it is a reasonable alternative.
Jews have lived all around europe for centuries.
Why would a religion dictate how you should kill animals, and why do people believe this is a religious matter rather than an animal-rights matter? I just can't understand people sometimes.
Chesterton's fence probably applies here.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Let the religious people do whatever they want or the animal rights activists?
The former obviously. The latter are the ones who want to restrict the freedoms of others.
Why would a religion dictate how you should kill animals, and why do people believe this is a religious matter rather than an animal-rights matter? I just can't understand people sometimes.
Chesterton's fence probably applies here.
Circumcision probably had hygienic benefits back then, too.
But we no longer live in these circumstances.
Because letting people do whatever they want is not even on the radar of these bureaucrats.
Because letting people do whatever they want is not even on the radar of these bureaucrats.
The price you pay in striving for social integration!
Yes, if you strife for integration you have long discussions in your society how to weigh opposing interests. I'm not sure what reasonable alternatives exist.
Pretty sure that would have been considered quite radical a hundred years ago.
[1]: https://www.nrk.no/vestland/etter-avtale-med-biskopen_-mikae...
[2]: https://www.nrk.no/mr/omstridd-prest-i-orskog-gar-av_-ville-...
Why would a religion dictate how you should kill animals, and why do people believe this is a religious matter rather than an animal-rights matter? I just can't understand people sometimes.
There is plenty of common sense in the holy books.