Live data from Hacker News

Apple’s new M1 Pro and M1 Max processors

apple.com

721–730 of 1001 posts

Re: Apple’s new M1 Pro and M1 Max processors

#721

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Huge, apparently. I just spent a bit over $7,000 for a top-spec model and was surprised to read that it comes with a 140 watt power adapter. Prior to my current M1 MBP, my daily driver was a maxed-out 16" MBP. It's a solid computer, but it functions just as well as a space heater. And its power adapter is only 100 watts.

the power supply is for charging the battery faster. the new magsafe 3 system can charge with more wattage than usb-c, as per the announcement. usb-c max wattage is 100 watts, which was the previous limiting factor for battery charge.

The other end of the new MagSafe is usb-c, which gets plugged into the power adapter.

Re: Apple’s new M1 Pro and M1 Max processors

#722
post #105

"Apple’s Commitment to the Environment" > Today, Apple is carbon neutral for global corporate operations, and by 2030, plans to have net-zero climate impact across the entire business, which includes manufacturing supply chains and all product life cycles. This also means that every chip Apple creates, from design to manufacturing, will be 100 percent carbon neutral. But what they won't do is put the chip in an expan…

Apple, the company that requires the entire panel to be replaced by design when a 6 dollar display cable malfunctions, is proud to announce its latest marketing slogan for a better environment.

And what are the chances of that part failing enough to impact the environment?

Re: Apple’s new M1 Pro and M1 Max processors

#723

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Laptops are only small component of biz for CPU chip manufacturers like AMD/Intel. AMD is traditionally weak in laptops and has not decent market share ever. This doesn't impact their business that much (Intel's numbers are not down that much after loosing Apple's deal after all) AMD and especially Intel have high margin server CPU business, Apple's entire value prop is low power segment, their chips are not designed…

Sure Intel have a server business but that’s smaller than client computing and revenues there are falling. I don’t know what the precise % is but if Apple have 8% market share by volume their % of Intel’s client business by value is much higher. Losing a growing customer that represents that much of your business is not a trivial loss. Of course this is all part of a bigger picture where falling behind TSMC enables a…

The Client Computing group is larger yes, however few things to keep in mind

1. they don't split revenue for Laptop market alone , So hard to say the impact of laptops (especially Apple) itself on their revenue or margins.

2. Also CCG is much slower growing than the Date Centric Group(DCG) business for Intel in the last 4-5 years as to be expected to be in the future as well.

3. The Apple deal was likely their lowest margin large deal(perhaps even loosing money ). Apple is not known for being generous to suppliers and also Intel was in not in any position of strength to ask great margins in the years leading up to Apple Silicon, the delayed processors and poor performance and threat of Apple Silicon had to have impact on pricing in the deal and therefore their margins.

Not saying that Intel don't have a lot to fix, but it also not that suddenly they are in much worse position than say last year.

Re: Apple’s new M1 Pro and M1 Max processors

#724
post #549

If Apple ever gets around to putting an M1 Max in a Mac Mini, that'd probably push me over the edge toward buying one.

Yeah, especially if it could run Linux. This would be a powerful little server. I decked out my workstation with a 16 core Ryzen & 96GB RAM and it didn't cost anywhere near the price of this new 64GB M1 Max combo. (But it may very well be less powerful, which is astonishing. It would be great to at least have the choice.)

Ubuntu already has an ARM build. Is there a reason you wouldn't be able to run linux?

Re: Apple’s new M1 Pro and M1 Max processors

#725

Earlier quoted context omitted.

the power supply is for charging the battery faster. the new magsafe 3 system can charge with more wattage than usb-c, as per the announcement. usb-c max wattage is 100 watts, which was the previous limiting factor for battery charge.

USB-C 3.1 PD delivers up to 240watts.

That's with 2 connectors right? I have a Dell Precision 3760 and the one connector charging mode is limited to around 90W. With two connectors working in tandem (they snap together), it's 180W.

The connectors never get remotely warm .. in fact under max charge rate they're consistently cool to touch, so I've always thought that it could probably be increased a little bit with no negative consequences.

Re: Apple’s new M1 Pro and M1 Max processors

#726
post #619

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I wouldn't hold your breath. Metal is still a second-class citizen in the GPU world, and there's not much Apple can do to change that. Having powerful hardware alone isn't enough to justify porting software, otherwise I'd be playing Star Citizen on a decommissioned POWER9 mainframe right now.

The major factor Apple has working in their favor with regards to the future of gaming on Macs is iOS. Any game or game engine that wants to support iPhone or iPad devices is going to be most of the way to supporting ARM Macs for "free". My older Intel Macs I'm sure are more or less SOL but they were never intended to be gaming machines.

iPhone games are an entire different beast however, and likely not what people “want”.

At least we still have Minecraft.

Re: Apple’s new M1 Pro and M1 Max processors

#727

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm not aware of a single even semi-major game (including popular indie titles) that run native on M1 yet. Everything is running under Rosetta and game companies so far seem completely uninterested in native support.

Disco Elysium, EVE Online, Minecraft*, Timberborn, Total War: Rome Remastered, World of Warcraft. Minecraft is kinda cheating, because Java, and even considering that it takes a bit of hacking. Alternatively you can sideload the iOS version.

Graalvm makes Minecraft kinda native heh.

Re: Apple’s new M1 Pro and M1 Max processors

#728

Earlier quoted context omitted.

But without games to play on it. Instead, you could just get an Xbox Series X for half that price.

PS5! Not true apple owner buys a Microsoft product!

Based on aesthetics and hardware design, the Series X is way more in line with Apple compared to the PS5.

Re: Apple’s new M1 Pro and M1 Max processors

#729
post #377

These things came at a great time for me. My late-2014 MBP just received its last major OS upgrade (Big Sur), so I'm officially in unsupported waters now. I was getting concerned in that era from 2015-2019 with all the bad decisions (butterfly keyboard, no I/O, touchbar, graphics issues, etc.) but this new generation of MacBooks seems to have resolved all my points of concern. On the other hand, my late-2014 model is…

Not that it matters but I should correct that it's a late-2013 model I have. I get confused because I bought it in 2014

Also I ended up pulling the trigger and preordering the base-model 14-inch. Let's hope it's as good as they say!

Re: Apple’s new M1 Pro and M1 Max processors

#730
post #377

These things came at a great time for me. My late-2014 MBP just received its last major OS upgrade (Big Sur), so I'm officially in unsupported waters now. I was getting concerned in that era from 2015-2019 with all the bad decisions (butterfly keyboard, no I/O, touchbar, graphics issues, etc.) but this new generation of MacBooks seems to have resolved all my points of concern. On the other hand, my late-2014 model is…

> JetBrains IDE Runaway feature creep IDE? I use it too.

Do you think it suffers feature creep?

I've used it since 2017 and it hasn't changed much since then. I guess they recently added some online code pairing feature I don't plan on using, but that's all that comes to mind.

Post reply on HN