Live data from Hacker News

On Receiving my Certificate of Loss of Nationality

rachelsruminations.com

231–240 of 256 posts

Re: On Receiving my Certificate of Loss of Nationality

#231

Earlier quoted context omitted.

》This misses the point in that the US is the _only_ developed country to impose worldwide taxation on its citizens regardless of where they live Not really. Norway does that for 3 years after leaving. Australia is very opinionated and may not allow people to change tax residency, even after physically moving out...

Norway and....Maryland. I've lived abroad most of my career and unwisely lived in Maryland for a short time. When I left to go abroad again, Maryland insisted on taxing my earnings, despite the overseas domicile. I found trying to fight Maryland over taxes was exasperating and futile. protip: if you live in Maryland, and plan an overseas life, establish a domicile in a tax friendly state beforehand. Then leave. Other…

That's also true for California. I established tax domicile in Nevada before expatriating.

Re: On Receiving my Certificate of Loss of Nationality

#232
post #198

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is not “having your cake and eating it too,” it’s much more complex. It also is never a case of “the country wasn’t good enough to live in.” I would love to live in the USA. That is not where life took me. At its simplest Americans are not free to live anywhere in the world the way citizens of all other countries are (even Eritrea, the only other country that taxes it’s citizens based on citizenship, does not su…

But in this case, even though you were living abroad, you’re still a American citizen and required to pay taxes. It’s not America’s fault that you’re living abroad for a decade. Is your intention to stay there for life, and if so, just renounce your citizenship. If you’re not willing to contribute as a citizen, why remain a citizen?

he had pay tax, can not USA let him pay more easier?

Re: On Receiving my Certificate of Loss of Nationality

#233
post #216
post #182

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Really? you were squirted out into a modern society managed by modern government institutions. Ignoring the fact that you’re discounting the miracle of life, you certainly took advantage of more than $2350 of services upon birth. Security, med school funding, Medicare hospital funding, road infrastructure…

You're assuming that the person in this scenario ever actually lived in the US. You can get an American citizenship without ever actually living there, which will then just make your life harder and if you want to make your life easier, that'll be $2350.

They walk the earth under the protection of the US government. Anywhere anytime they need it, uncle sam will save them, or bomb the shit out of anyone that dares harms them.

A very cheap lifetime insurance policy for $2350.

Civis romanus sum

Re: On Receiving my Certificate of Loss of Nationality

#234
post #33

I have a question about this, that I've never been able to find a good answer to: what happens if you unilaterally renounce US citizenship? Consider the situation: you're a dual US / Dutch citizen. You want to avoid paying US income tax (or just to avoid filling in a form each year that results in the IRS telling you that your tax bill is $0 because the Netherlands' tax rate is higher). But the State Department's ren…

There is no unilateral renunciation of citizenship. The tax treaty between the US and the Netherlands has what is known as a 'savings clause', which basically states, regardless of what else is in the treaty, nothing will stop the U.S. from taxing the US person based on US laws as though the treaty did not exist, except for specified circumstances.

https://hr.vanderbilt.edu/international-tax/tax_treaty_savin...

Re: On Receiving my Certificate of Loss of Nationality

#235
post #135
post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What are the consequences to not filing? My wife is a US citizen, and she hasn't filed for two years. I've met other US citizens that don't file either. So far I have not heard of any issues relating to not filing.

Does she earn much? If her income is low enough, she may be exempt from filing. https://www.hrblock.com/tax-center/income/other-income/how-m... (Note that I am not a tax professional and you should not rely on anything I say.)

It doesn't matter. If she has bank accounts abroad exceeding the threshold, she's obliged to file just to disclose her foreign bank accounts.

Re: On Receiving my Certificate of Loss of Nationality

#236

Earlier quoted context omitted.

》This misses the point in that the US is the _only_ developed country to impose worldwide taxation on its citizens regardless of where they live Not really. Norway does that for 3 years after leaving. Australia is very opinionated and may not allow people to change tax residency, even after physically moving out...

Norway and....Maryland. I've lived abroad most of my career and unwisely lived in Maryland for a short time. When I left to go abroad again, Maryland insisted on taxing my earnings, despite the overseas domicile. I found trying to fight Maryland over taxes was exasperating and futile. protip: if you live in Maryland, and plan an overseas life, establish a domicile in a tax friendly state beforehand. Then leave. Other…

You can renounce your statehood without renouncing your citizenship. Former Virginian here and I renounced my Virginia statehood for the same reason. It's common for American states to continue to tax their citizens after they leave. And there aren't really any downsides to not being a resident of any state.

Re: On Receiving my Certificate of Loss of Nationality

#237
post #16

The conversation here at this moment seems to be focused solely on whether or not it is complicated or costly to keep filing US taxes. This misses the point in that the US is the _only_ developed country to impose worldwide taxation on its citizens regardless of where they live. The only other country to do so is Eritrea and the US has routinely criticized them for doing so. Moreover, it makes expats ineligible for c…

》This misses the point in that the US is the _only_ developed country to impose worldwide taxation on its citizens regardless of where they live Not really. Norway does that for 3 years after leaving. Australia is very opinionated and may not allow people to change tax residency, even after physically moving out...

3 years seems reasonable. The USA does it forever.

Re: On Receiving my Certificate of Loss of Nationality

#238
post #216
post #182

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Really? you were squirted out into a modern society managed by modern government institutions. Ignoring the fact that you’re discounting the miracle of life, you certainly took advantage of more than $2350 of services upon birth. Security, med school funding, Medicare hospital funding, road infrastructure…

You're assuming that the person in this scenario ever actually lived in the US. You can get an American citizenship without ever actually living there, which will then just make your life harder and if you want to make your life easier, that'll be $2350.

They still take advantage of the citizenship no matter where they are.

People waste more money on lottery tickets.

Re: On Receiving my Certificate of Loss of Nationality

#239
post #215

Rachel isn’t any better than the restauranteur displaying a “no blacks” sign. It’s not cool to block entire countries from your blog just because.

I thought it was cool since American websites have been blocking European countries for years now.

At least there are actual legal reasons behind that, we Europeans made our choice. Blocking Russia because you don’t like the country is just shitty xenophobia.

Re: On Receiving my Certificate of Loss of Nationality

#240

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It exists only when people believe it exists. If no one believed in your citizenship, your passport would just be a little notebook with no value. When going from a world without citizenship to a world with it, nothing needs to change outside of the human brain. In that sense, it’s a fiction.

No. A passport says what country must take you when other places decide to deport you or refuse you entry.

You may be missing my point. If no one believes in the country’s existence, including the people who live in the land that the country is purported to encompass, then it doesn’t exist. Nations aren’t tangible physical objects. They exist in the collective human imagination. Yes. Your passport is just a notebook if no one believes in the country it is supposed to be for.
Post reply on HN