Inevitable outcome in a society that is terrified of everything. And to think that our ancestors sailed across the oceans into the unknown and faced diseases, war, famine, and worse. Now we are instituting a surveillance state in the name of a fairly bad flu virus with a 99% survival rate. We really need a new frontier. Hopefully space travel happens before human beings become completely domesticated.
The average lifespan for the period you are describing (say, 1492-ish since we're talking about sailing) was their mid-thirties (and probably lower for the people that actually got on those boats). So I think I like our strategy better. And it's not even about "but at least they truly lived !", their lives were miserable. It's a lot easier to "face the unknown" when the "known" is itself often religious persecution,…
OSHA to require employers with 100 employees vaccinate or test workforce
491–500 of 1001 posts
Re: OSHA to require employers with 100 employees vaccinate or test workforce
#492Earlier quoted context omitted.
This exact argument could be used to push back against environmental standards, occupational safety standards, or drinking water standards. I don't want cholera outbreaks and I don't want the health system to collapse because of COVID.
If it weren't already standard, there is no way we'd be able to mandate seat belts today. EDIT: I'm pro seatbelt just in case that needed clarifying
Re: OSHA to require employers with 100 employees vaccinate or test workforce
#493The more time passes, the more I'm convinced that the right strategy would have been to make the vaccines initially cost $35,000 a dose, so that the outcry would have been that the Illuminati was making it impossible for the common man to get access to these life-saving drugs. Then, after months of argumentation, people could have had the victory of having the vaccines "liberated" and offered for free, such that gett…
Advised acquaintence in a PR company and reporters at beginning of this that they should "find" stories that the wealthy and celebrities were flying to countries where they could jump the queue for vaccination if they wanted to get more uptake. Response was government had other plans. Given my previous work in digital identity, I was getting inquiries from vaccine passport companies in the summer of last year. This w…
Re: OSHA to require employers with 100 employees vaccinate or test workforce
#494Earlier quoted context omitted.
You really think those death numbers are accurate? There are a ton of incentives present (read: federal $$$) for hospitals and others to exaggerate death counts and case numbers.
Yes. Based on my traumatized friends that work in ERs in a few different states and the people I know who have died, I would say that it is much more reasonable to believe that those numbers are close to accurate than to suspect a large scale conspiracy, but I guess the world is less interesting and more depressing when you consider the likely reality over shadowy intrigue.
Re: OSHA to require employers with 100 employees vaccinate or test workforce
#495Prior to mandating anything, the US government should step up and ensure that every household has a free weekly delivery of rapid at-home tests. There is no reason for us to be individually flying blind whenever we get a sniffle or headache or other minor symptom. Additionally, there is evidence that a prior covid infection grants stronger immunity than at least the J&J vaccine, and 40%+ percent of the US population…
It would have been chilling a year ago, now? Meh.
Re: OSHA to require employers with 100 employees vaccinate or test workforce
#496Earlier quoted context omitted.
If you want an interesting read, check out the battle over seatbelt interlock devices. Optional seatbelts (with perhaps fines for non-use depending on the jurisdiction) was the compromise between none at all and cars not functioning without them being in use. https://www.history.com/news/seat-belt-laws-resistance
That was a really interesting read, thank you I guess we have Elizabeth Dole to thank in part for near ubiquitous air bags and seatbelts. I hate to think how many would die every year without them.
In the 1990s, more.
Except in the highest speed crashes frontal airbags are mostly redundant for belted in passengers (the first S in SRS is there for a reason), especially in this age of seatbelt pre-tensioners.
Side curtain airbags are far more helpful these days.
Re: OSHA to require employers with 100 employees vaccinate or test workforce
#497They'll be fighting this out in the courts for years.
Re: OSHA to require employers with 100 employees vaccinate or test workforce
#498Our largest healthcare provider has already mandated vaccines for their staff and insurance companies are now following suit because they got hammered with life insurance payouts for 2020 and first half of 2021. Waiting for retailers to announce this as well at some point.
Do you have a source for this comment? One thing is certain, more people are purchasing life insurance so if anything Covid has been a windfall for the carriers, for various reasons not just increased sales.
Re: OSHA to require employers with 100 employees vaccinate or test workforce
#499Earlier quoted context omitted.
What does "sterilizing" mean in this context?
It means that for people with an immune system that's functioning within the normal range, the vaccine entirely prevents infection (100% effectiveness). Population-wide effectiveness isn't 100%, but for most individuals it is.
I'm a bit confused by the term "infection" here.
Let me split some hairs:
Vaccines work by teaching the immune system how to fight an intruding virus, so it doesn't have to spend days or weeks figuring it out while the virus destroys your body.
That means vaccinated people get viruses as often as unvaccinated, but defeat it much faster, usually before you notice any symptoms.
My confusion is that I would call the time my immune system spends fighting a virus in my body an "infection", but apparently that is not the established use.
Re: OSHA to require employers with 100 employees vaccinate or test workforce
#500Earlier quoted context omitted.
You really think those death numbers are accurate? There are a ton of incentives present (read: federal $$$) for hospitals and others to exaggerate death counts and case numbers.
They can exaggerate but they can’t completely fabricate 650k deaths. What number do you think warrants this action? 500k? 300k?