Live data from Hacker News

PinePhone – Open Source Smart Phone Supported by Major Linux Phone Projects

pine64.org

201–210 of 265 posts

Re: PinePhone – Open Source Smart Phone Supported by Major Linux Phone Projects

#201
post #194

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>The common Linux interfaces are very easy to decipher and have a good usability The most common interface is bash (or alternative bash-like languages). Which is pretty much required if your a hardcore linux user. Applications push users towards command line interfaces. This is NOT easy to decipher. You are lying to yourself. >Of course, usability always depends on the specific task you have to do in a given context.…

Mate, you are taking this too personal. your account here won't survive long like that. The "smearing foss" comment wasn't targeting you. You are just wrong about the usability and compatibility. Especially compatibility is the strong suit of FOSS software in general and Linux specifically. There is broader hardware and software support. It's a fact, get over it. Usability always depends on the context and task, your…

>Mate, you are taking this too personal. your account here won't survive long like that. The "smearing foss" comment wasn't targeting you.

If it's not targeting me. Who is it targeting, "Mate?" Clearly it was targeting me, as you're REPLYING to me. Let's be honest here, You were attempting to "smear" me, but now you're back pedaling. Play it safe, don't even use the word "smear." No one is doing that here, it's just opinions and discussion. Keep it that way.

>You are just wrong about the usability and compatibility. Especially compatibility is the strong suit of FOSS software in general and Linux specifically. There is broader hardware and software support. It's a fact, get over it.

Nah I'm totally right. FOSS is less compatible with most hardware. The "official broad support" isn't even the the measuring stick here. It's actual hardware crashes and bugs.

>1. No, Bash is not the most common interface, though I like it. It has to be used for the rare edge case, everything else can be done with GUIs. If your impression is otherwise you are not using mainstream distros nor are you doing regular tasks. Use Gnome or KDE on Ubuntu and stop distro hopping.

"Mate," my impression encompasses gnome and KDE on Ubuntu as well as non mainstream distros, so I know my shit. Bash is 100% the most common interface, even on ubuntu. Any time you want to configure your operating system you will touch the CLI. Applications promote it, tutorials promote it, if you aren't using it I'm not sure what reality you're living in.

If you're thinking of the world as if it's Grandmas using the browser vs. Programmers, then yes, grandmas using the browser have everything they need with ubuntu without touching the CLI. However, there are advanced users of computing outside of the programming world. 3D modelling software, audio production, Network Administration... to get even these things to work right most of these people will indeed touch the CLI.

>2. I'm playing exclusively on Linux since Proton got introduced, though I even used Linux for games before that. I'm okay with the occasional game not working, as Windows was vastly more cumbersome to keep in a working state, plus the many games that did not work there will also not be forgotten by me.

I'm a hardcore gamer so I have over 100 games in my steam library. I have a linux dell laptop with a quadro card. Only low fidelity games work; and certain games trigger the OS to restart. Running windows this never happens. Not even referring to proton. Just talking about games compiled to target linux.

>3. Void Linux is my current choice. I was a supporter in a Ubuntu forum and used that for many years, and still for the dayjob. I did use Funtoo for a while in between.

Try tinkering with NixOS or arch. You will have a better view of compatibility issues that linux suffers from. Ironically the fact that "choices" for distros exist and the fact that you have to pick the "right" OS for the right perspective is a big usability issue in itself.

Re: PinePhone – Open Source Smart Phone Supported by Major Linux Phone Projects

#202

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I'm coming to the realisation that open source projects will always provide a lower quality than comerical ones. That is not true. As far as I am concerned Linux is clearly superior OS for my laptop over commercial alternatives. > How can we honestly expect a small team of developers to compete with the larger teams a commerical project can afford? In many cases they win by default. If "no leaking of personal data"…

> That is not true. As far as I am concerned Linux is clearly superior OS for my laptop over commercial alternatives. I love Linux. I'm a Linux desktop user but I can 100% say my experience is degraded compared to mac and windows users. Not just in apps that are there but in small things like sometimes it changes which mic is being used without telling me. Driver support is also a thing. I have my GUI crash on me on…

As a user of Linux on my daily driver I recently received a machine with windows 10 for a work project. I've been using it about 50% of the time for the past 2 months and I'm missing Linux big time. It's slower on better hardware, it does seemingly unpredictable things, software crashes more often and the driver situation is still a problem contrary to what everyone has told me. There's countless design choices that make my workflows harder as well.

I also have a Mac mini, and my wife has a MacBook pro. They are better but stability has never been an issue with my Linux desktop experience. I've been using it since 2005 or so. It used to offer far less software and a worse user experience but was always very stable.

Arch BTW.

Re: PinePhone – Open Source Smart Phone Supported by Major Linux Phone Projects

#203

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The CLI I would argue sucks. Compared with powershell? Powershell is better designed. But that's besides the point. CLIs in itself are harder to use than GUI and the entire FOSS ecosystem biases itself towards CLI. So that in itself is a marker for inferior usability. With training a CLI can be made superior in many aspects to a GUI. But it takes training and mostly only people in IT are willing to go through this tr…

We can have both tho. What stops you to use funky GUI to tidy up things then have 'export to powershell' command ?

Yeah but overall in windows or OSX you can use the entire OS without touching the command line. Not so for linux. Most linux users are using both a GUI and a shell window under the GUI. That's the point.

Re: PinePhone – Open Source Smart Phone Supported by Major Linux Phone Projects

#204
post #194

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Mate, you are taking this too personal. your account here won't survive long like that. The "smearing foss" comment wasn't targeting you. You are just wrong about the usability and compatibility. Especially compatibility is the strong suit of FOSS software in general and Linux specifically. There is broader hardware and software support. It's a fact, get over it. Usability always depends on the context and task, your…

>Mate, you are taking this too personal. your account here won't survive long like that. The "smearing foss" comment wasn't targeting you. If it's not targeting me. Who is it targeting, "Mate?" Clearly it was targeting me, as you're REPLYING to me. Let's be honest here, You were attempting to "smear" me, but now you're back pedaling. Play it safe, don't even use the word "smear." No one is doing that here, it's just…

Okay, that's wasted time, and your comment is inappropriate. So in very short and as a last comment:

> I'm a hardcore gamer so I have over 100 games in my steam library.

How hardcore^^ 358 are in mine, + many more GOG and Humble Bundle games + hundreds on CD/DVD I probably will never play again.

> Only low fidelity games work; and certain games trigger the OS to restart.

Linux is around equally strong in gpu driver performance. There are differences ofc, but if game performance is vastly different for you, then your Dell laptop might not be using the Nvidia gpu. Proton is not a factor here, its performance impact is minimal (and it can be faster to run the Windows versions of games with Proton than the Linux version natively).

> Try tinkering with NixOS or arch.

If you tinker don't be surprised if the result is tinkery.

> the fact that you have to pick the "right" OS for the right perspective is a big usability issue in itself.

It's not. You do not know what usability is.

Re: PinePhone – Open Source Smart Phone Supported by Major Linux Phone Projects

#205
post #152

Earlier quoted context omitted.

True. Unfortunately, the next person will ask about if this phone will have the same apps and games as they do on their iOS/Android device. They'll just say, does it have WhatsApp?, Netflix?, Instagram?, Snapchat?, TikTok?, Chrome?, 1Password?, etc, etc. The fact that it has been admitted that 'it's slow, buggy, and flat out unreliable if you need to be able to receive / answer calls and texts for anything important'…

https://source.puri.sm/Librem5/community-wiki/-/wikis/Freque...

It has already been admitted that both the PinePhone and the Librem 5 cannot run these apps well enough to justify switching or even recommending them.

What use is a smartphone that claims to run apps (Native apps, Android apps or Web Apps) but runs them much worse than the user's previous device (or can't run them at all)? To the users hoping to make the switch, it feels more like a downgrade; especially PWAs.

For example, in the FAQ, Librem mentions:

> Unlike most mobile apps on Android and iOS, these applications were not written to monetize users' personal data or extract fees from users, and their code is free/open source, so it can be verified that they aren't spyware or contain code that acts against the best interest of their users.

Well it seems that Signal is a known and a widely recommended messaging app which generally doesn't do all the things claimed by Librem, yet many users that use Signal cannot even run it on their Librem 5 or PinePhone. So they will see no point in considering buying any of these phones anyway.

Therefore, these devices are still not ready yet to be considered serious alternatives to Android users or in general. They're going in the right direction, but it will take years of waiting for improvements in the current state of open source smart phones.

Re: PinePhone – Open Source Smart Phone Supported by Major Linux Phone Projects

#206
post #205

Earlier quoted context omitted.

https://source.puri.sm/Librem5/community-wiki/-/wikis/Freque...

It has already been admitted that both the PinePhone and the Librem 5 cannot run these apps well enough to justify switching or even recommending them. What use is a smartphone that claims to run apps (Native apps, Android apps or Web Apps) but runs them much worse than the user's previous device (or can't run them at all)? To the users hoping to make the switch, it feels more like a downgrade; especially PWAs. For e…

Signal apps are an issue, for sure. Signal desktop can run, but it's not fun, because it's not responsive at all. Currently, the best alternative available imho is Axolotl, which is what I use.[0]

[0] https://github.com/nanu-c/axolotl

Re: PinePhone – Open Source Smart Phone Supported by Major Linux Phone Projects

#207
post #204

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>Mate, you are taking this too personal. your account here won't survive long like that. The "smearing foss" comment wasn't targeting you. If it's not targeting me. Who is it targeting, "Mate?" Clearly it was targeting me, as you're REPLYING to me. Let's be honest here, You were attempting to "smear" me, but now you're back pedaling. Play it safe, don't even use the word "smear." No one is doing that here, it's just…

Okay, that's wasted time, and your comment is inappropriate. So in very short and as a last comment: > I'm a hardcore gamer so I have over 100 games in my steam library. How hardcore^^ 358 are in mine, + many more GOG and Humble Bundle games + hundreds on CD/DVD I probably will never play again. > Only low fidelity games work; and certain games trigger the OS to restart. Linux is around equally strong in gpu driver p…

>Okay, that's wasted time, and your comment is inappropriate. So in very short and as a last comment:

Your initial comment accused me of smearing FOSS. It's inconsiderate and a literal lie. I would say that's the most inappropriate thing that's occurred in this thread.

>How hardcore^^ 358 are in mine, + many more GOG and Humble Bundle games + hundreds on CD/DVD I probably will never play again.

365. and Gog. We're pretty much the same in terms of amount of games. If you have that many games you should know absolutely there are problems. Maybe your hardware configuration just happens to be common and compatible. I use a quadro nvidia card which is not the traditional GeForce stuff. Both of our use cases are valid but you have to combine our use cases to form a holistic broad spectrum view. My use case is an indication of compatibility problems, likely with quadro. This doesn't happen with windows.

>If you tinker don't be surprised if the result is tinkery.

When you tinker you understand the internals more. When you understand the internals more you better understand the issues. I've used ubuntu AND tinkered with NixOS. So I have broader experience than you.

>It's not. You do not know what usability is.

Part of my Job description is UI design. I'm a full stack engineer from the front (browser based UI's and product design) all the way to C++ and embedded systems on the back end. Usability is my Job but also hardcore systems development. Most full stack devs stop at the application layer so I would say because someone pays me to know what usability is, I pretty much know it quite well. Lack of choice is a usability feature, Apple employs this aspect heavily by restricting hardware options; it's a big part of why apple software is perceived to be very robust.

Another big part of usability is also perception. The actual capability of a product contributes less to usability than the perception of the capability of the product. Apple again uses this strategy big time.

Re: PinePhone – Open Source Smart Phone Supported by Major Linux Phone Projects

#208
post #205

Earlier quoted context omitted.

https://source.puri.sm/Librem5/community-wiki/-/wikis/Freque...

It has already been admitted that both the PinePhone and the Librem 5 cannot run these apps well enough to justify switching or even recommending them. What use is a smartphone that claims to run apps (Native apps, Android apps or Web Apps) but runs them much worse than the user's previous device (or can't run them at all)? To the users hoping to make the switch, it feels more like a downgrade; especially PWAs. For e…

> yet many users that use Signal cannot even run it on their Librem 5 or PinePhone

This is really a fault of Signal, because they forbid forks and do not provide a good app for GNU/Linux phones. It's like a walled garden. I do not use Signal for this reason.

Re: PinePhone – Open Source Smart Phone Supported by Major Linux Phone Projects

#209
post #46

Earlier quoted context omitted.

An OS isn’t just an OS, it’s OS + apps. Doesn’t matter who’s fault it is. The bottom line is that productivity is affected.

Nevertheless you cannot reasonably say that the OS itself is bad. It's the pressure of the monopolies against freedom.

It's not about the blame game. When asking a user that has no care, ideology or stakes in the game how "good" an OS is... if the OS crashes, that OS is likely bad.

This is the overall the most important metric.

Re: PinePhone – Open Source Smart Phone Supported by Major Linux Phone Projects

#210

The pinephone is great, in fact I'm typing this comment from mine. That said, fair warning to anyone thinking about getting one: it's slow, buggy, and flat out unreliable if you need to be able to receive / answer calls and texts for anything important (e.g. work). Once they get the software worked out over the next few years though, it'll be the best thing out there. No ads, no bullshit, just a phone with a mainline…

> Once they get the software worked out over the next few years though, it'll be the best thing out there. No ads, no bullshit, just a phone with a mainline linux distribution. I'm coming to the realisation that open source projects will always provide a lower quality than comerical ones. How can we honestly expect a small team of developers to compete with the larger teams a commerical project can afford? The realit…

> Also, a large part of using a smart phone is the apps. Without apps the phone is just really a phone.

I attempt to list them all at https://linmobapps.frama.io.

Post reply on HN