Earlier quoted context omitted.
The brain as an organ analogy doesn't also reflect the self-reflective, self-influencing, learning side of it well. A kidney doesn't remember the last time someone abused it and react reflexively when they see that person. It also doesn't tend to go into tight loops of racing thoughts about that person randomly either. If you treat it like it is a simple organ (x thing happens, give drug y), it can lead to some reall…
> The brain as an organ analogy doesn't also reflect the self-reflective, self-influencing, learning side of it well. Except it’s not an analogy… it’s literally an organ. Software happens to run on top of it… and when there are bugs in on, we call those functional diseases. But understand that the physical organ and system underlies all if it. If your cpu or memory are broken.. no software or software fixes can fix t…
And the brain, just like many processors CAN and does work around damaged memory, and can and does work around damaged processors/bugs (depending on the nature and severity of them of course). Phineas Gage being one of the clearest recent examples, but there are many more.
Minimizing what is going on to saying ‘it’s all chemical processes’ is really missing the point - it would be like saying a modern CPU is ‘just moving electrons around’. It’s reductio ad absurdum.
I haven’t personally run across a Buddhist philosophy claiming knowledge of the way the brain works. I have run across Buddhist philosophy claiming to know how the universe works, which seemed pretty silly to me. I’ve also run across Buddhist philosophy aiming to provide tools to help people better understand and connect with it and themselves better, which I personally have found helpful.