Earlier quoted context omitted.
> because it covers all the nuance of our individual situation. Without wanting to downplay your achievement, I've worked for organisations that did the same thing with MS Access back in the early oughts. The 'custom' application grew with the organisation. Features were bolted on over the years inelegantly. It was impossible to integrate easily with other systems. The quirks of the system were known by long time emp…
overpromise and underdeliver. Something that under-delivers is much more useful that something that doesn't exist. In most situations and most companies the the choice is never between the ugly Access thing and top quality software written by team of highly educated professional programmers. It's a choice the between the ugly Access thing and an ad-hoc collection of text files and post it notes.
No. I disagree.
Sometime a badly constructed solution is worse than no solution.
> It's a choice the between the ugly Access thing and an ad-hoc collection of text files and post it notes.
I think this was definitely true before the advent of SaaS products.