Earlier quoted context omitted.
You'll still get paid for your normal job. It's not like that money would be thrown away, you're not working for free. You go to your job and work because you want more money . I think UBI is largely untested and its proponents should proceed with caution. But I also think people are overconfident in assuming that people wouldn't work; the reality is that we don't have a ton of data in either direction. If the 20th-2…
> If the 20th-21st century has taught us anything, it's that consumerism is a very powerful motivator. Or, perhaps, that there is much attention on consumers who spend significantly as they have “louder” lifestyles that are easy to show. Poverty rates are high with 14% of the US under the poverty line [0] and I don’t think consumerism is motivating them very much. And I think it’s risky to equate considering as a lar…
> Whether consumerism is a powerful enough motivator... I just think people are very over-confident talking about what is definitely going to happen in a system that has basically never been tried before.
People are really eager to look at populations and make very strong assertions about what their intrinsic motivators are with (in my mind) little evidence.
> and I don’t think consumerism is motivating them very much.
Are 14% of the population below poverty levels because they like living there? Because our systems discourage saving money once you're on wellfare? Because of market pressures? We have basically zero large-scale experiments, but people on both sides of the UBI test seem really confident that they know what everyone will do.