Earlier quoted context omitted.
You could probably get away with never releasing it and just leave it null.
Or simply hand you.tube to YouTube. Why not? :)
Our plans for PeerTube v4
111–120 of 174 posts
Re: Our plans for PeerTube v4
#112Earlier quoted context omitted.
Wow only one developer working on PeerTube and not even full time. No way will that level of effort be able to challenge any of the incumbents.
You are welcome to help. I have very little time but managed to get a working android client running and published: https://github.com/sschueller/peertube-android
It's why FOSS can't make serious inroads in a lot of domains. Like 20 years ago I was convinced we'd all never be paying for Word, but here we are, 20 years later, still buying Word.
Re: Our plans for PeerTube v4
#113Can someone explain the point of federating PeerTube. Their site doesn't really explain it, and it seems like you still need to create an account on every instance you want to use (if you want to comment on/rate videos). How is it different from lots of independent sites, with RSS feeds for each channel?
You only need one account on any instance and you can rate/comment on any video in the federated network. However there are instances that don't follow each other and for those you would need a separate account.
And doesn't that make it an N^2 problem? Does every instance have to follow every other instance to make this work?
Re: Our plans for PeerTube v4
#114Question to PeerTube: What are you doing to curb the ever-growing number of white supremacists using your platform?
Re: Our plans for PeerTube v4
#115Earlier quoted context omitted.
You are welcome to help. I have very little time but managed to get a working android client running and published: https://github.com/sschueller/peertube-android
Has this line of thinking ever actually convinced even one person? It's why FOSS can't make serious inroads in a lot of domains. Like 20 years ago I was convinced we'd all never be paying for Word, but here we are, 20 years later, still buying Word.
Re: Our plans for PeerTube v4
#116Earlier quoted context omitted.
You are welcome to help. I have very little time but managed to get a working android client running and published: https://github.com/sschueller/peertube-android
Has this line of thinking ever actually convinced even one person? It's why FOSS can't make serious inroads in a lot of domains. Like 20 years ago I was convinced we'd all never be paying for Word, but here we are, 20 years later, still buying Word.
Inertia has long lasting effects.
Re: Our plans for PeerTube v4
#117Earlier quoted context omitted.
You are welcome to help. I have very little time but managed to get a working android client running and published: https://github.com/sschueller/peertube-android
Has this line of thinking ever actually convinced even one person? It's why FOSS can't make serious inroads in a lot of domains. Like 20 years ago I was convinced we'd all never be paying for Word, but here we are, 20 years later, still buying Word.
Re: Our plans for PeerTube v4
#118Earlier quoted context omitted.
It isn't about challenging anything. It's about a libre alternative. Does the apple challenge the orange? They are both fruits!
As a peer-to-peer service, its existence depends on uptake, and as a video service, uptake of PeerTube is a challenge to YouTube.
Re: Our plans for PeerTube v4
#119Earlier quoted context omitted.
You are welcome to help. I have very little time but managed to get a working android client running and published: https://github.com/sschueller/peertube-android
Has this line of thinking ever actually convinced even one person? It's why FOSS can't make serious inroads in a lot of domains. Like 20 years ago I was convinced we'd all never be paying for Word, but here we are, 20 years later, still buying Word.