51–60 of 174 posts
Question to PeerTube: What are you doing to curb the ever-growing number of white supremacists using your platform?
(PS. I'm genuinely asking, I would appreciate an honest reply)
I am very hopeful for Peertube and their project, since I'm currently partaking in hosting a large video website for otherwise content too controversial for mainstream platforms like Youtube. (Political content if you were wondering, but I won't indulge what kind) This takes back control to creators in such a way that essentially only domain registrars will be able to dictate what content may stay alive on the intern…
https://videos.martinezperspective.org/videos/trending?a-sta...
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yes, I'm not in the US. But I think I didn't express myself clearly. Actually, what I mean is more something along the lines: "people should be held accountable by what they spread". Things like defamation are punishable in the US, right?
No, not under criminal law. It requires a civil suit.
People like to talk about "defamation", but in America the bar is so high that it's only rarely applicable.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Would probably violate trademark law and icann would make you give it up. I guess if you go opennic or use a different alternative root they might not care about court-ordered domain forfeitures.
You could probably get away with never releasing it and just leave it null.
Question to PeerTube: What are you doing to curb the ever-growing number of white supremacists using your platform?
The few times I've visited any of the 'chans however, it's been quite different - but curiously I don't see the same people making these complaints mentioning them.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Are you suggesting that a significant use for email could be communication between white supremacists? It's probably less than 0.0001% of all emails sent. On the other hand, if PeerTube is used to host a lot of pro-facist video content made by racists that could be a problem for PeerTube. It's an existential threat to the technology. If governments and ISPs see it as predominantly used for that then they'll ban it. I…
You're going to crucify an emerging technology for being where edge groups congregate, even though that's that's been the MO of the Internet since BBS days?!
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Punishment for crimes like hate speech should be enforced > "personal media" should not be arbitrarily controlled This threw an exception, because "hate speech" is an arbitrary type. It has no objective definition. It is defined by whoever happens to be defining it.
Not that i agree with the GP comment, but isn't that exactly the point of courts? Eg death threats and all sorts of illegal wording are inaccurate in the literal, programming sense. Humans (courts/etc) interpret and ultimately rule if a set of vague concepts is in violation. If it wasn't for this capability it would be hilariously easy to avoid almost all repercussion from written/spoken word by just adding a dash of…
I am very hopeful for Peertube and their project, since I'm currently partaking in hosting a large video website for otherwise content too controversial for mainstream platforms like Youtube. (Political content if you were wondering, but I won't indulge what kind) This takes back control to creators in such a way that essentially only domain registrars will be able to dictate what content may stay alive on the intern…
It just surprised me how effective this method of censorship was and I wonder how often it happens with more important topics.
Context: https://twitter.com/BS__Exposed/status/1321535914036748288?s... https://twitter.com/icapulet/status/1375232839415906304?s=20 https://twitter.com/FinanceLancelot/status/13752898727562731...
Question to PeerTube: What are you doing to curb the ever-growing number of white supremacists using your platform?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Elaborate.
Question to Email: What are you doing to curb the ever-growing number of white supremacists using your platform?
Regardless, I get what you mean.