Live data from Hacker News

National Security Commission on Artificial Intelligence's Final Report

nscai.gov

81–90 of 115 posts

Re: National Security Commission on Artificial Intelligence's Final Report

#81

Off topic - if I wanted to write a report like that with those cool templates and graphics - what did they use ? I don’t think google docs can do that :)

The graphics seem to mostly be stock images, for example this one[0] from chapter one. It's almost certainly made with Adobe.

[0] https://stock.adobe.com/398758401

Re: National Security Commission on Artificial Intelligence's Final Report

#82

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Don't use bare LaTeX. Use Lyx or another frontend for it. Much more like Office, though it works a bit different - Lyx is not WYSIWYG, it's more "what you ask for is what you get", which takes a little bit of getting used to. Still, it's the space shuttle without all those years of astronaut training.

LaTeX frontends tend to be slow, because LaTeX is not designed for realtime recompilation or layout. I prefer editors with quick but not realtime updating, where I can write the code and see the document change.

I don't recall Lyx as being slow (even on what is now a slow machine), but I wasn't using it on a very big project.

Re: National Security Commission on Artificial Intelligence's Final Report

#84

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I never got that logic—the US has been in armed conflict in various forms since the end of WWII, whether directly or through the CIA. It seems more like nukes enable violence from my perspective.

The world was a much more violent place before pax americana.

> The world was a much more violent place before pax americana.

Europe, for sure is a lot less violent, as for the rest of the world? I won't believe that on face value; south America specifically got more violent, and I suspect everywhere else is a wash (or is not attributable to American force projection). I attribute the peace in Europe to the EU rather than pax Americana.

Re: National Security Commission on Artificial Intelligence's Final Report

#86

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I mean it’s not like intel and their fans are utterly worthless, they may not be on par with TSMC 5nm yet, but in the end given a strong strategic need, I don’t think we’d be without advanced chips for very long if TSMC is overtaken by China. There’s also the fact that a war between China and Taiwan is almost certainly going to go hot with the USA too, possibly leading to nuclear exchanges… It’s much more likely that…

Also worth noting that TSMC is about to build an 5nm fab in America. https://www.forbes.com/sites/timbajarin/2021/02/16/why-tsmcs...

By the time it’s finished, 3nm will be what we really want for the high end

Re: National Security Commission on Artificial Intelligence's Final Report

#87
post #50

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Say what you (or Kubrick) will about mutually assured destruction, it sure does seem to have prevented a lot of violence, despite also seeming totally insane.

I never got that logic—the US has been in armed conflict in various forms since the end of WWII, whether directly or through the CIA. It seems more like nukes enable violence from my perspective.

It seems relatively peaceful: https://ourworldindata.org/war-and-peace

Re: National Security Commission on Artificial Intelligence's Final Report

#88

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Macron was signing a partnership to install Huawei factories in France. So he is doing exactly what China did - Making sure production is happening in his country, regardless of who nominally owns the factory. A step in the right direction.

The Germans are doing the right thing by spending money to create domestic competitors for 5G manufacturing

Sure, that's even better, absolutely.

Re: National Security Commission on Artificial Intelligence's Final Report

#89

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Falling behind in manufacturing seems to include the entire supply chain, not just fabs. Global supply chains are fragile, so we’d do well to build as much physical infrastructure and expertise on shore as possible. This is a policy problem more than anything else.

The problem of US-based or ally-based technology companies that fall behind competitively or economically and then are allowed to fail inescapably ensures US dependence for essential/secure tech supplies on others, some with motives contrary to our well-being. This chink in our commercial, military, and security armor should wake the US government to the necessity of underwriting some essential industries, products,…

They fund the universities through debt in the form of student loans. The schools then funnel indebted graduates desperate for financial security into various industries where their human capital is securitized. You can call that laissez-faire, but I see a lot of similarities with China’s top down system and predict those similarities to increase as we are forced to compete with China more directly.

Re: National Security Commission on Artificial Intelligence's Final Report

#90
post #28

> First, U.S. courts have severely restricted what types of computer-implemented and biotech-related inventions can be protected under U.S. patent law.6 Critical AI and biotech-related inventions have been denied patent protection since 2010.7 Facing uncertainty in obtaining and retaining patent protection, inventors pursue trade secret protection. Trade secrets do not readily promote innovation markets, because trad…

That's unfortunate. To rebuild our domestic manufacturing capability we should loosen on intellectual property.

Why? What would loosening IP do in this regard?
Post reply on HN