Not sure what a thinly resourced piece like this is doing so high up on HN. There’s really very little evidence that this has anything to do with racial slurs. From a quick read: last June, the channel was banned for “harmful and dangerous” content. The ban was removed in under 24 hours. YouTube has not confirmed the reason. And yet: > Experts suspect that it was the usage of words like "black" and "white" that confu…
YouTube blocked chess channel after mistaken detection of racial slurs
41–50 of 584 posts
Re: YouTube blocked chess channel after mistaken detection of racial slurs
#42Re: YouTube blocked chess channel after mistaken detection of racial slurs
#43“ The researchers now suggest that social-media platforms should incorporate chess language in their algorithms to avoid future incidents like this.” Or maybe don’t automate banning YouTube channels via nebulous black boxes? Or can advertisers stop being afraid of anything and everything?
Re: YouTube blocked chess channel after mistaken detection of racial slurs
#44Earlier quoted context omitted.
No, I meant nebulous as in unclear, hazy, or undefined. Nobody knows what the YouTube algorithm is going to decide is inappropriate next. Their site’s wording is very vague and unclear as well. You have youtubers censoring swear words now, and people uploading footage from video games like TF2 have had issues before.
> Nobody knows what the YouTube algorithm is going to decide is inappropriate next. Then that is the very definition of "opaque", which is what YouTube want and aim for.
Re: YouTube blocked chess channel after mistaken detection of racial slurs
#45Delegating prosecution of possible hate speech to commercial entities was always going to be bad. Youtube is essentially a public forum with audience of entire countries, where the people who run it choose what gets amplified, what gets shunned and what get outright blocked. Who would be happy with a private entity deciding the future mindsets at this scale?
That is it exactly what I’ve been saying about twitterführer Dorsey ever since he blocked the NY Post. Though in his case he went so overboard with banning and blocking everyone with a viewpoint he didn’t agree with that he made all the other world leaders take notice and be concerned that they could get blocked just as easily. I expect that after the next G7 summit we will start to see the social media companies bro…
Some related fiction (or is it?) https://slatestarcodex.com/2018/10/30/sort-by-controversial/
Re: YouTube blocked chess channel after mistaken detection of racial slurs
#46Re: YouTube blocked chess channel after mistaken detection of racial slurs
#47“ The researchers now suggest that social-media platforms should incorporate chess language in their algorithms to avoid future incidents like this.” Or maybe don’t automate banning YouTube channels via nebulous black boxes? Or can advertisers stop being afraid of anything and everything?
Your comment has been moderated for racist language ("black boxes").
I don't receive many PRs. This is a real trend.
Re: YouTube blocked chess channel after mistaken detection of racial slurs
#48Earlier quoted context omitted.
Your comment has been moderated for racist language ("black boxes").
You kid but i've received 2 pull-requests on my open-source project, which only goal was to replace "Blacklist" with "Blocklist" in the app preferences. I don't receive many PRs. This is a real trend.
Re: YouTube blocked chess channel after mistaken detection of racial slurs
#49Earlier quoted context omitted.
Your comment has been moderated for racist language ("black boxes").
You kid but i've received 2 pull-requests on my open-source project, which only goal was to replace "Blacklist" with "Blocklist" in the app preferences. I don't receive many PRs. This is a real trend.
Git 'master' branch derangement is another example of this BS.
Re: YouTube blocked chess channel after mistaken detection of racial slurs
#50Earlier quoted context omitted.
Your comment has been moderated for racist language ("black boxes").
You kid but i've received 2 pull-requests on my open-source project, which only goal was to replace "Blacklist" with "Blocklist" in the app preferences. I don't receive many PRs. This is a real trend.
It's complete bullshit, though. This particular bullshit is awful since it trivializes all this historic pain to some inane game of word association.
There's no point arguing, though, just drag your heels until they get bored and go off on some other crusade.