Earlier quoted context omitted.
People also don't live or structure their lives to satisfy those who had a written conversation and want the copies burned.
Well, they should. Permanent record of every small transgression or juvenile excess or stupidity is inhumane...
Comp.lang.c Google Group has been banned
131–140 of 199 posts
Re: Comp.lang.c Google Group has been banned
#132Re: Comp.lang.c Google Group has been banned
#133Hi Folks, I have archives of comp.lang.c group going back 35 years (1986-2021) and when I saw this news I decided to prioritize this one and just started synchronizing it into my archive. In a couple of hours, you should be able to see all of the posts ever made to: comp.lang.c group over at my Usenet Archives: Here it is, enjoy: https://usenetarchives.com/threads.php?id=comp.lang.c&y=0&r=... BTW. I just reworked ent…
Thank you very much for creating and maintaining this archive.
I am not sure how big of a commitment I am making when I say this but we (rsync.net) would like to give you free service, forever, to back up this resource.
Please contact us if this would be useful.
Re: Comp.lang.c Google Group has been banned
#134Re: Comp.lang.c Google Group has been banned
#135Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is hilarious. I could see something similar happening on HN today.
It shouldn't matter whether or not it's hilarious. Attempts at humor often fall flat on the internet and are somewhat frowned on per HN guidelines. You're objectively wrong and anyone who agrees should chime in to say so. Disagree? Fine, but come to this thread to tell us why. #s
Re: Comp.lang.c Google Group has been banned
#136Earlier quoted context omitted.
To a sociologist connect with people and work through some pretty heavy emotional challenges is a goodmine and insight into history.
Not sure why the sociologist’s desires should take precedence over the original posters’.
I don't think we give a lot of weight to what the original publishing intent was for anything published 100, 200 years ago, why would the change in the future?
Re: Comp.lang.c Google Group has been banned
#137Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is an interesting point: that a commitment to practical free speech for everyone, everywhere, will tend towards consolidation of platforms and natural monopolies. Cancellation, deplatforming, etc. might actually drive platform diversity and innovation which will, in turn, further freedom of expression far more effectively than public pressure to tolerate everything.
Careful , it will also drive to isolationism, echo-chambers and the quashing of controversial dissenting opinions. If you dont think right now we have opinions as controversial as "Gay people should be able to marry each other if they want" was 100 years ago,an opinion which right now we consider almost self-evident, I would urge you to think harder.
Re: Comp.lang.c Google Group has been banned
#138Re: Comp.lang.c Google Group has been banned
#139Some fun comp.lang.c history: Dennis Ritchie posted, sharing an extremely early version of a C compiler. Richard Heathfield (well known C book author) jokingly chided Ritchie for posting something off-topic, as it was not part of ANSI C. In typical Usenet fashion, this triggered a huge thread, arguing over the appropriateness of the joke. Even Linus Torvalds got involved. Apparently Heathfield emailed Ritchie private…
This is hilarious. I could see something similar happening on HN today.
Re: Comp.lang.c Google Group has been banned
#140Earlier quoted context omitted.
Dunno. History matters and historians would probably strongly disagree. Some things are more important than you think. Too much gets lost too easily.
Not everything is deserving of being treated as historical artifacts worthy of retention. A friend has lamented that when he was in college in the late 80s, he used USENET as a way to connect with people and work through some pretty heavy emotional challenges. Retaining his personal struggles is hardly "history" - if anything, the historical value of retaining the struggles of one inconsequential person is far lower…