Cryptocurrency continues to gain more ground but I still have my reservations about it being the currency of the future. If by design, cryptocurrency has a finite volume of transferrable currency, do early adopters have an unfair advantage that could potentially make the currency unusable? I don’t see how it could possibly be fair when earlier mining yielded currency more quickly.
There is no reason that limited supply need be an inherent mechanism to a crypto currency.
Visa May Add Cryptocurrencies to Its Payments Network, Says CEO
81–90 of 176 posts
Re: Visa May Add Cryptocurrencies to Its Payments Network, Says CEO
#82Are there any crypto projects that allow chargebacks? I religiously avoid using my debit card except at bank ATMs to avoid that once every few years when someone skims my credit card. That and rewards are the main value-add of a traditional payment flow at the moment.
Re: Visa May Add Cryptocurrencies to Its Payments Network, Says CEO
#83About the volatility of cryptocurrency. Shouldn't this even out when mining becomes too expensive and enough people adopted a cryptocurrency? Like, aren't we simply too early for making sense of it all?
2) what does the phrase mining becomes too expensive mean? Satoshi always envisioned that mining would be taken up by big firms and specialty miners not individuals.
3) price volatility has nothing to do with the size of adoption every single person on Earth could be using Bitcoin and it wouldn't make it any less volatile. Maybe if major retailers decided to price things in terms of Bitcoin that could help but that will probably never happen.
Re: Visa May Add Cryptocurrencies to Its Payments Network, Says CEO
#84Great, let’s all accelerate climate change even faster.
Re: Visa May Add Cryptocurrencies to Its Payments Network, Says CEO
#85Re: Visa May Add Cryptocurrencies to Its Payments Network, Says CEO
#86And instead I got cryptocurrency.
Re: Visa May Add Cryptocurrencies to Its Payments Network, Says CEO
#87Earlier quoted context omitted.
Visa is in the payments business. The US Federal Reserve ("The Fed") is going live with an instant payments service in 2023-2024 [1] [2]. What does that leave Visa with? Hence, the existential crisis (first, trying to buy Plaid, and now "Crypto!"). [1] https://www.frbservices.org/financial-services/fednow/index.... [2] https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2020/08/31/fednow-the-federa...
Visa is left with a valuable rewards game system where people get cash back or points or whatever. Plus the liability protections that credit cards come with. People can already use debit cards with no effort, and merchants can accept that at very minimal costs. But still, most merchants are hesitant to offer lower prices to purchases with debit card because they are betting people spend more with credit cards. I don…
Re: Visa May Add Cryptocurrencies to Its Payments Network, Says CEO
#88Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don't think their rewards system is as valuable on you might think. When the cost of visa transactions are ultimately pushed to the consumer (~3%), they will eventually realize, those rewards are not worth the cost. Off course, this will probably take some time. But in my opinion, Visa's moat is thin and mostly reliant on the behavior of their users. For US, I expect Visa to still be dominant, but not so much in ot…
> they will eventually realize, those rewards are not worth the cost. Debit cards in the US have been available and basically free to use for all merchants and purchasers for many decades. Yet, merchants willingly do not give people that buy with a debit card a discount. That seems like proof to me that merchants are betting that they earn more money from the use of credit cards, even after the fees associated with t…
Re: Visa May Add Cryptocurrencies to Its Payments Network, Says CEO
#89Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think this is one of those things where people overestimated how much things would change in the short-term, but will grossly underestimate how much they will change in the longterm. 5 years is a pretty short window in the grand scheme of things when talking about the adoption of technologies.
Gold has been in use for hundreds of years and yet it's still very volatile. If Bitcoin is digital gold that doesn't really solve the volatility problem.
Point being that even with gold's volatility it is still seen by pretty much everyone as a viable store of value, and I think BTC will be similar.