Earlier quoted context omitted.
China is a country lead by engineers with unlimited power to do whatever they want. If they want all cars to be electric, that will happen. If they want a 5 million person city just there because it's logistically advantageous, then that will happen. The good thing is that they can make decisions like this. The bad thing is that they can make decisions like this.
Autocracies seem to be the most efficient form of governance. It's a shame that this also means that they can do evil things very efficiently, given no one can stop them.
I've wondered about this. Is there a way that democracy could compete, possibly by reflecting "the will of the people" quickly and accurately?
Or would that always fundamentally be a popularity contest?
Or will democracy require something akin to "martial law" to quickly decide and act on urgent matters?