I like wire ( https://wire.com/en/ ) but no one I know uses it :-/
Poll: Switching from WhatsApp
141–150 of 972 posts
Re: Poll: Switching from WhatsApp
#142Re: Poll: Switching from WhatsApp
#143See why Signal is not much better than Whatsapp: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25668547 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25669657 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25668659 Edit: if you would like to avoid constant switching in the future, you have to think long-term and consider a distributed network, not another walled garden.
You are completely missing the point of todays discussion, it's not about who can distribute binaries or implement client. It's about not giving Facebook more data.
Edit: Matrix solves all problems I refer to.
Re: Poll: Switching from WhatsApp
#144Been using Telegram for a long time. I don't trust it any more than I do with WhatsApp (therefore, Facebook), however it is well done and thought out, has a real desktop client with a real desktop UI toolkit and enough of my contacts are on it already, therefore it's the best compromise to me. I greatly dislike Signal's UI when I tried it out and I've read about some weird decisions lately (that "using a PIN? uploadi…
Note that normal Telegram chats are not end to end encrypted. You have to start a “secret chat” for that.
Definitely a better alternative to WhatsApp in any case.
Re: Poll: Switching from WhatsApp
#145Doc friends and I assembled to compare the features (we feel) matter most across all major messengers. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1-UlA4-tslROBDS9IqHal...
Re: Poll: Switching from WhatsApp
#146Earlier quoted context omitted.
You are completely missing the point of todays discussion, it's not about who can distribute binaries or implement client. It's about not giving Facebook more data.
From this point of view you can switch anywhere. But if you would like to avoid constant switching in the future, you have to think long-term and consider a distributed network, not another walled garden. Edit: Matrix solves all problems I refer to.
The point isn't to not give Facebook more data; it is to not give anyone more data. Which is the case with Signal, but not with say Discord or Zoom.
Telegram uses homebrew crypto and for some reason doesn't have E2EE enabled by default.
Re: Poll: Switching from WhatsApp
#147Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Telegram is a downgrade in terms of both security and privacy Care to elaborate? Haven't heard/read anything that points in that direction. Except for the "nearby people" feature but that its up to you to enable.
I trust Bruce Schneier on this stuff and he advises against telegram: https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2016/06/comparing_mes... Also in the comments on that "article" some people link against a cryptoanalysis of telegram, which can be found here: http://cs.au.dk/~jakjak/master-thesis.pdf Someone else also mentions that telegram stores message logs on their server, if that's true it is definitely a big no no.
Seems like an okay compromise to me, but I'm no security expert.
Re: Poll: Switching from WhatsApp
#148I never blamed technology or any algorithms, people was evil before and still the same. I'm so glad, the folks here that I find brilliant, is having this conversation. Just keep the dialogue going, it is working. Change happens in small steps, one people, one family, one neighbourhood at a time.
Re: Poll: Switching from WhatsApp
#149Re: Poll: Switching from WhatsApp
#150Earlier quoted context omitted.
how? I thought they where the first ones to implement e2e encryption?
- Weird hand-rolled crypto protocol of questionable quality (MTProto). Probably fine in practice, but leaves a bad taste in your mouth, and their marketing to prove it made it worse. It has been through a few revisions since initial scrutiny. - Only Secret Chats are E2EE. Normal use is just subject to transport encryption. However, this is true for any platform with server-side chat history.