We read the paper that forced Timnit Gebru out of Google
31–40 of 683 posts
Re: We read the paper that forced Timnit Gebru out of Google
#32I have a genuine question: If a person of color (I am myself non-white) is not performing, what does it take to fire them without the entire world playing the race card on you? Are we creating a society that makes it impossible to fire a person of color? You know there are bad apples in every race, right? How do we handle such scenarios? Seems unfair to me, myself being a person of color - I don't want the world to t…
You’re going to be downvoted, not because of your questions, but because you decided to put “please bring the downvotes” at the end of your comment. Why would you undermine yourself by sticking such an antagonistic comment at the end of your post?
We've created an atmosphere of fear. I don't feel comfortable voicing my opinions even after being anonymous on the internet. That's pretty fucked up.
Re: We read the paper that forced Timnit Gebru out of Google
#33Is this what esteemed PhD AI ethicists spend their time on? It sounds like a useless grad school paper. I think much less of everyone now.
The mistake was expecting much from “PhD AI ethicist” - a title Orwell accidentally left out.
Re: We read the paper that forced Timnit Gebru out of Google
#34I have a genuine question: If a person of color (I am myself non-white) is not performing, what does it take to fire them without the entire world playing the race card on you? Are we creating a society that makes it impossible to fire a person of color? You know there are bad apples in every race, right? How do we handle such scenarios? Seems unfair to me, myself being a person of color - I don't want the world to t…
Yes because this happens everytime a PoC is fired. Every single PoC who is fired gets this media attention.
This is not good.
Re: We read the paper that forced Timnit Gebru out of Google
#35Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yes because this happens everytime a PoC is fired. Every single PoC who is fired gets this media attention.
I think it is causing a reverse effect. It's going to create more racist behavior from employers - "If we cannot fire a PoC or some minority, let's not even bother hiring them in the first place." This is not good.
Re: We read the paper that forced Timnit Gebru out of Google
#36Earlier quoted context omitted.
The mistake was expecting much from “PhD AI ethicist” - a title Orwell accidentally left out.
Medical ethics is a serious subject, and then there was Asilomar on the ethics of genetic engineering. Just because this AI ethicist isn't one, it doesn't follow the field is worthless.
Re: We read the paper that forced Timnit Gebru out of Google
#37> A version of Google’s language model, BERT, which underpins the company’s search engine, produced 1,438 pounds of CO2 equivalent in Strubell’s estimate So... they're saying it used about $100 worth of electricity. [ https://www.eia.gov/tools/faqs/faq.php?id=74&t=11 ] [ https://www.statista.com/statistics/190680/us-industrial-con... ]
I find these CO2 arguments from model training extremely misleading. If this is what you care about, why don't you actually try to make electricity cleaner. Realistic, that's a much more effective way to address this tiny issue, together with the grand total of 50% of humanity's CO2 emissions on top. To me it always seems like virtue signalling, showing that you "care", while not having to actually make any realistic…
Wasn't Google prioritizing green energy for their datacenters?
Re: We read the paper that forced Timnit Gebru out of Google
#38Earlier quoted context omitted.
You’re going to be downvoted, not because of your questions, but because you decided to put “please bring the downvotes” at the end of your comment. Why would you undermine yourself by sticking such an antagonistic comment at the end of your post?
I removed it. I know its going to be downvoted though. Because it is going against the grain on HN. But, I am being respectful. We've created an atmosphere of fear. I don't feel comfortable voicing my opinions even after being anonymous on the internet. That's pretty fucked up.
There is no way to prove you are actually PoC. And even if you did, it's incredibly unrelated to the matter at hand.
No one has even claimed she was fired for bad performance and dozens of Google employees have said in no part of their process was academic rigor taken into account.
What you're doing is the literal definition of concern trolling.
Re: We read the paper that forced Timnit Gebru out of Google
#39I have a genuine question: If a person of color (I am myself non-white) is not performing, what does it take to fire them without the entire world playing the race card on you? Are we creating a society that makes it impossible to fire a person of color? You know there are bad apples in every race, right? How do we handle such scenarios? Seems unfair to me, myself being a person of color - I don't want the world to t…
A workplace that isn't hostile to people of color and evidence of the cause of dismissal