Live data from Hacker News

Amazon reportedly has Pinkerton agents surveil workers who try to form unions

npr.org

301–310 of 468 posts

Re: Amazon reportedly has Pinkerton agents surveil workers who try to form unions

#301
post #267
post #145

In 1920 Appalachia, coal companies owned all the land, the homes and stores. They also paid workers with their own special money (that was useless everywhere else). The security companies they hired where armed and violent towards miners and their families. https://explorepartsunknown.com/west-virginia/coal-minings-d... Today, people can tour these old towns and learn the history of how the coal companies trapped and…

Is there anything stopping workers from crowdsource their own protection anonymously? Does it have to be some kind of formal union? If you think about it, work is just a business deal and wouldn't be possible for employees create some kind of company that deals with the companies they are employed? Pretty much like an agency, I guess.

Congratulations, you've invented the Molly Maguires.

Re: Amazon reportedly has Pinkerton agents surveil workers who try to form unions

#302
post #297
post #293

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It doesn’t have to be secret, just your membership is secret. It can have open plan offices in a cool neighborhood, pay politicians and all. Just have centralized Emlpoyers information management system where information about employers, like salaries they pay business they do, the good and the bad to work there etc. So when you are getting a job you apply to your not-union and they tell you what to expect and how mu…

So it's like Glassdoor or Salary.com? That's not a union, that's not HR, that's not armed protection.

Are unions armed protection?

Anyway, the idea is to have a coordinator that work on your benefit. Companies, even the large ones are simply people coordinated by the capital owners.

The not-union is a coordinator for the people who are not the capital owners but those who deal with the capital owners.

The aim is to assist for a fair deal through information, not to extort the capital owners.

Re: Amazon reportedly has Pinkerton agents surveil workers who try to form unions

#304
post #267
post #145

In 1920 Appalachia, coal companies owned all the land, the homes and stores. They also paid workers with their own special money (that was useless everywhere else). The security companies they hired where armed and violent towards miners and their families. https://explorepartsunknown.com/west-virginia/coal-minings-d... Today, people can tour these old towns and learn the history of how the coal companies trapped and…

Is there anything stopping workers from crowdsource their own protection anonymously? Does it have to be some kind of formal union? If you think about it, work is just a business deal and wouldn't be possible for employees create some kind of company that deals with the companies they are employed? Pretty much like an agency, I guess.

>work is just a business deal and wouldn't be possible for employees create some kind of company that deals with the companies they are employed?

have you read Godfather?

Re: Amazon reportedly has Pinkerton agents surveil workers who try to form unions

#305

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You actually believe that NPR doesn’t edit articles to protect the people who fund them?

Yes, I do actually believe in their editorial independence. Here's an NPR opinion piece talking openly about the subject https://www.npr.org/sections/publiceditor/2012/03/16/1487788... Some excerpts that I liked (keep in mind, these are out of context, which is largely focused on why we should keep a very close eye out): > Companies are most interested in getting their name before NPR's audience. They are, in other w…

> prostitute

I expected better than NPR. They could have just said "like asking a professional journalist to be a PR agent".

Re: Amazon reportedly has Pinkerton agents surveil workers who try to form unions

#306
post #137

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> the people who are forced to work in Amazon's warehouses Who is being forced?

Many people don't have the job flexibility and choice that many of us on HN have and are forced to take any available employment or go homeless.

It really is amazing that people really refuse to understand how freaking privileged we are to have good pay, good mobility and the reality of people who don't. Competition for "unskilled", ugh I hate that word, jobs is fierce and when you're living on the verge of homelessness you have neither the time nor money to invest in yourself.

Re: Amazon reportedly has Pinkerton agents surveil workers who try to form unions

#307
post #103

Earlier quoted context omitted.

To the point where if someone ever introduces themselves to me as a Pinkerton employee, my first instinct would be to assume they're immoral and not someone I want to know. It's a company with a history of supporting exploitation wherever it's gone.

By extension, anyone you meet who works at Amazon should be considered that as well. Google and Facebook too probably. Walmart? Honestly any corporation. Add anyone working for the government in there as well

I don't think that is fair. Pinkerton has a history of actual violence and in directly enabling the very worst tendencies of some of the very worst abusive labour practices. In terms of participating in oppression, the proportion of Pinkerton employees directly involved in making lives worse for employees is much higher than most other companies and at least most democratic governments.

Re: Amazon reportedly has Pinkerton agents surveil workers who try to form unions

#308
post #303

How does one get a job as a Pinkerton agent? Not that I'd want one, but I can't imagine the job posting/how they approach it. Security team?

Here's one job posting. It seems just like applying for any other job.

https://www.glassdoor.com/job-listing/agent-pinkerton-JV_IC1...

Re: Amazon reportedly has Pinkerton agents surveil workers who try to form unions

#309
post #215

Earlier quoted context omitted.

At the same time in most Western countries decent working conditions and wages are already mandated by law. I don't know what's the situation in the US but in Europe that means that conditions cannot be horrible to start with if the company acts within the law (which would be expected of a company like Amazon, but maybe I'm optimistic). Unions are a way to negotiate a better deal than the legal minimum for unskilled…

> At the same time in most Western countries decent working conditions and wages are already mandated by law Are they though? There are a plethora of activist, legal, legislative groups focused on both working conditions (often on narrower groups, like say migrant farm labor) and minimum wage issues would probably argue this. Obviously working condition protections are much better than they were before 1950s-ish, and…

> here are a plethora of activist, legal, legislative groups focused on both working conditions (often on narrower groups, like say migrant farm labor) and minimum wage issues would probably argue this.

That's right and most of their work in Western Europe is helping workers enforce the law.

Re: Amazon reportedly has Pinkerton agents surveil workers who try to form unions

#310
post #165
post #63

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Don't force your workers to work in dangerous conditions with low pay and no voice in their work place, and maybe they wouldn't want to form a union.

What if I don't do any of those things? What if I run the most worker-centric paradise, with employee empowerment, great wages, benefits and conditions? And what if the national organization of an umbrella labor organization considers my non-union workforce as a threat to both their budget and their political power? And what if they provide materials and advisors promoting unionization, despite the fact that they are…

If you “ran” the most worker-centric paradise, you’d be the elected CEO of a co-op where the workers had democratic control of the means of production. In such a place, there’d of course be no need for a union because the workers would have the say in what happens already.

Now your strawman benevolent dictatorship could never exist since you would still be denying workers control over their workplace. Thus they may form a union to fight for that control.

Post reply on HN