Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Yes, Bezos does not want an amazon union and won't just let it happen without a fight. Same as always. Which is, if I recalled correctly, illegal.
Not if you're rich
Amazon reportedly has Pinkerton agents surveil workers who try to form unions
141–150 of 468 posts
Re: Amazon reportedly has Pinkerton agents surveil workers who try to form unions
#142Really disappointing to see the "Well, what did you expect?" comments already. Just because companies have been trying to prevent organization of their labor for over a century doesn't mean it isn't still messed up now. It's easy to say that it's just the way the world works from your desk, the people who are forced to work in Amazon's warehouses with terrible working conditions don't have that luxury.
I have not seen any convincing evidence that Amazon’s warehouses have “terrible working conditions”, do you have a source that might change my opinion?
https://revealnews.org/?s=amazon
A search for "Amazon working conditions injuries" on DDG or Google will return many of those, but also follow-ups by many media houses considered to be reasoned/reliable, rather than rabid and ranting.
Anecdotal, perhaps, but these anecdotes are there in significant numbers.
Re: Amazon reportedly has Pinkerton agents surveil workers who try to form unions
#143Earlier quoted context omitted.
Do companies have a right to circulate anti-union material, to have anti-union speakers come to work, etc?
Depends on the country but _tentatively_ yes, America has a infamously anti-union, anti-worker history though so there's significantly more holdover of it actually happening, what most other countries don't have is services like the Pinkertons, previously a literally rifle-armed military/police force for the purposes of seeking out and often murdering union leaders and breaking up strikes by force. What I was taught…
England and the rest of the Anglosphere adopted what are often called "Peelian principles," focused on policing by community consent, 50+ years earlier than that.
Re: Amazon reportedly has Pinkerton agents surveil workers who try to form unions
#144Earlier quoted context omitted.
> People are getting payed $16 that is incredible for an unskilled labor position. That's one view, but it's only informed by "the way things are". Another view is based on the way things should be, that no one should have to work for less than the wage it takes to live a reasonable life. https://livingwage.mit.edu/ offers values for this. I don't see why someone should work full time and still end up poor.
And I disagree that everyone should get paid a loving wage. Let's take 2 identical twins Juan and Jamal (because if you've seen Juan you've seen Jamal). In school Jamal works hard, studies, and puts his efforts first. Juan on the other hand decides football is the way to go and along with that partying, drinking and at one point gets a gal pregnant. They graduate Jamal gets several scholarships and goes to school whi…
Re: Amazon reportedly has Pinkerton agents surveil workers who try to form unions
#145https://explorepartsunknown.com/west-virginia/coal-minings-d...
Today, people can tour these old towns and learn the history of how the coal companies trapped and abused workers. A lot of unions and labor rights groups came out of the abuses that occurred in Appalachia.
Re: Amazon reportedly has Pinkerton agents surveil workers who try to form unions
#146Really disappointing to see the "Well, what did you expect?" comments already. Just because companies have been trying to prevent organization of their labor for over a century doesn't mean it isn't still messed up now. It's easy to say that it's just the way the world works from your desk, the people who are forced to work in Amazon's warehouses with terrible working conditions don't have that luxury.
> the people who are forced to work in Amazon's warehouses Who is being forced?
Re: Amazon reportedly has Pinkerton agents surveil workers who try to form unions
#147Really disappointing to see the "Well, what did you expect?" comments already. Just because companies have been trying to prevent organization of their labor for over a century doesn't mean it isn't still messed up now. It's easy to say that it's just the way the world works from your desk, the people who are forced to work in Amazon's warehouses with terrible working conditions don't have that luxury.
> the people who are forced to work in Amazon's warehouses Who is being forced?
Re: Amazon reportedly has Pinkerton agents surveil workers who try to form unions
#148Earlier quoted context omitted.
Can I just point out that I think the "horrible working conditions" things is a little played up. You want to know terrible working conditions dancing with a sign for 5 hours a day in the sun when it's 90+. I did that for 3 years and was happy to do the job, mind you this was only 10 years ago so it isn't forever. I made 7.50 an hour. I would've killed to get a job at amazon back then. People are getting payed $16 th…
It is incredibly played up. 10 years ago, warehouse conditions were the same or worse as they are now except you would be lucky to get $16/hr without a forklift operator certification or some other credential that made it more than just 'unskilled labor'
Re: Amazon reportedly has Pinkerton agents surveil workers who try to form unions
#149Earlier quoted context omitted.
The exact same people? I marvel at their longevity! 128+ years is quite an accomplishment!
Corporations are people, legally.
An apple isn't a pear, even though both are fruits.
Re: Amazon reportedly has Pinkerton agents surveil workers who try to form unions
#150Earlier quoted context omitted.
Where do we draw the line? What tactics are ok for a company to use to combat unions if it doesn't want them? Or should companies just accept and work with any union that forms?
In most Western countries, workers have a right to form unions. So yes, companies have to accept it.
Unions are a way to negotiate a better deal than the legal minimum for unskilled labour.