Live data from Hacker News

Sketch: Proud to Build a Truly Native Mac App

sketch.com

341–350 of 362 posts

Re: Sketch: Proud to Build a Truly Native Mac App

#341

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Run natively on the Mac /s

Why /s though? It is a huge pro for some people.

Because it's already been mentioned a number of times in the thread and is a very major selling point (IMO).

Re: Sketch: Proud to Build a Truly Native Mac App

#342

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Better support for the built-in accessibility features of macOS.

I wonder how many people with visual accessibility issues would take a graphic design job

They could certainly take copywriting and proofing jobs.

Re: Sketch: Proud to Build a Truly Native Mac App

#343
post #285

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't think they will be ever featured, because they left AppStore and are selling their software directly, without paying Apple Tax.

Adobe apps also get featured and they are not on the App Store.

Not their entire suite, but Photoshop Elements and Lightroom are in the Mac App Store. You can even buy a subscription to Lightroom with in-app purchases.

And of course Adobe has many apps in the iOS App Store.

Re: Sketch: Proud to Build a Truly Native Mac App

#344

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Native is nice, native is fast Only if you are using a Mac. On linux, the zoom client is neither fast nor (in my admittedly slightly subjective opinion) nice.

Zoom is Electron isn't it? That's not native.

No, it's native. At least on Mac.

edit: judging by `strings`, it's Objective C/Cocoa app on Mac. As native as it can be. No idea on Linux.

Re: Sketch: Proud to Build a Truly Native Mac App

#345
post #197

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think one the issues here was that sketch started as a very small indie mac app. In the case of one or two developers working on a niche product, exclusivity is forgivable. The problem is that sketch got way too popular, way too big and took investment and are now expected to compete with a competitor like figma.

Which, as a person who uses Linux and Windows, makes Figma the clear winner. Sketch isn't even a choice if I can't use it.

Which is fair enough, my point is I think it was a mistake for Sketch to even put itself in the same ballpark as Figma and raise investment. It could have stayed as a niche tool and likely supported a small team.

Re: Sketch: Proud to Build a Truly Native Mac App

#346
post #166

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I am pro and don't use cloud software in production, actually this is a clause in contract for my clients. They care about quality not trendiness. Downvotes on your comment are telling me that this is the new JS topic. Oh no.... :)

I think there are plenty of things to knock cloud based SaaS tools for but quality is a weird one - there are plenty of high quality cloud based solutions that can deliver high quality outputs.

Sorry, my english is not polished enough to express my point of view properly. I will try again. When I talk about quality it is in context applied to servicing my clients. In context of UX/UI and graphical design. When using a traditionally licensed software I own a tool. I can do my professional work with this tool and make a profit. New features add extra functionality and if I have a business case for this new functionality I can invest. But in most of use cases I can do my work with previous version with base functionality. Life cycle of graphic software must be long. Thats why I use Affinty software for design and avoid Adobe products. I know what my ROI is. My software is not bloated with background web services and notifications.

Re: Sketch: Proud to Build a Truly Native Mac App

#347
post #204

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Ridiculous statement. Sketch is very much alive and it can survive on Mac-only users for a long time going forward as well, if they decide to.

Am I the only one who doesn't think Apple have much interest in supporting classic MacOS apps in the future? Back in the day we used to judge the viability of Apples new techon if the Adobe suite was using them. This was a big deal during the Classic to OS X switch and the PPC to Intel switch. I'm convinced Apple sees the future of Macs as running iPad apps, Photoshop and Illustrator are already there. Just how many…

I haven't really been too worried about that. They're free to build apps that are simpler to use, but the technology and frameworks behind it still need to be in place. As long as Apple themselves need to build e.g. Xcode, they need to be focusing on allowing developers to build macOS apps.

Re: Sketch: Proud to Build a Truly Native Mac App

#348
post #222

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think the killer feature of macs with Apple Silicon is that the iPad versions of Slack and Discord would "just work" and people wouldn't have to deal with Electron crap anymore.

I’ll believe the story that these will be any good when Catalyst apps will start behaving like native apps. If developers can’t bother making a native experience with frameworks that are meant to do this, I don’t think they will with an even simpler paradigm. My canary in the coal mine: Apple’s own SF Symbols.

This has nothing to do with Catalyst. Apple Silicon macs will natively run the exact same binary as the iOS version, no Catalyst needed.

Re: Sketch: Proud to Build a Truly Native Mac App

#349

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think the killer feature of macs with Apple Silicon is that the iPad versions of Slack and Discord would "just work" and people wouldn't have to deal with Electron crap anymore.

Discord is made out of React native I think. The performance is incredible most of the times. Sometimes it goes crazy and uses 100% CPU for a long time as if there's a while loop somewhere. And with Apple Silicon, Im not sure that the restriction right now is architecture. Swift supports both x86 and ARM right? The problem is that the interactions are different in the desktop OS and simply recompiling or running it o…

Apple Silicon macs can run iOS/iPadOS binaries natively, no recompilation and no Catalyst needed. I think the experience of iPad apps will be just fine.

Re: Sketch: Proud to Build a Truly Native Mac App

#350

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I love the things VSCode offers that its competition doesn’t. I can’t imagine working with any of the other available editors for the Mac. I hate how I feel like I’m working in a weird web app all day every day. I feel both simultaneously.

Give Panic's Nova a try: https://nova.app

Wanted to say I started taking a look yesterday and I’m not sure how I feel about it yet. But I don’t have my whole workflow set up yet. Thanks for the nudge, I’d been meaning to give it a look!
Post reply on HN