Earlier quoted context omitted.
No. The U.S. intell community does not do that, empirically. There isn’t even the apparatus for doing that. The US IC’s ties to industry, apart from defense contractors and communications, are very tenuous, hamstrung by clearance and classification problem and a very insular culture. So, in addition to being factually incorrect, is very damaging to the national discourse to normalize CPC’s strategy of wholesale IP th…
> is very damaging to the national discourse to normalize CPC’s strategy of wholesale IP theft. Can you clarify why? China is a state actor. State actors generally can be expected to act in self serving ways. What would be the basis for preventing espionage? Is this a moral argument that spying is evil? Of course countries should protect themselves from foreign espionage if they can, but I don’t see what blame accomp…
China again boosts R&D spending by more than 10%
111–113 of 113 posts
Re: China again boosts R&D spending by more than 10%
#112Earlier quoted context omitted.
No. The U.S. intell community does not do that, empirically. There isn’t even the apparatus for doing that. The US IC’s ties to industry, apart from defense contractors and communications, are very tenuous, hamstrung by clearance and classification problem and a very insular culture. So, in addition to being factually incorrect, is very damaging to the national discourse to normalize CPC’s strategy of wholesale IP th…
The US intel community engaged in industrial espionage against Brazil's Petrobras. A third world country. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/sep/09/nsa-spying-bra...
If you have something other than speculation that backs up your claim, I am happy to consider it. But this is not it.
Re: China again boosts R&D spending by more than 10%
#113Earlier quoted context omitted.
The US intel community (a) doesn't need to do that because in general US tech is world-class and (b) wouldn't be very good at their jobs if they admitted to it publicly. I suggest you review your Cold War history for examples of when both sides were absolutely stealing each others' technology. When you're top dog, your job is largely counter-intelligence. > So, in addition to being factually incorrect, is very damagi…
You are normalizing CPC actions by stating that the US does it or would do it in the CPC’s position.
The US absolutely does it, has done it and will do it again. That doesn’t mean chinas not defending themselves against it.