Earlier quoted context omitted.
> In China there are “execution vans” with no other purpose even suggested: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Execution_van From your article > Liu was convicted > a reprieve after appealing > given a retrial Your entire article describes convicted death row prisoners, whether we agree with or respect China's due process at all. Why did you think it bolstered your argument to talk about Chinese due process in an articl…
You think all the other non-“notable” people executed in one of those things got the appropriate legal protections too? Anyway I’m just trying to say that if you want to apply the most unfriendly interpretation to some happening in America, in order to compare it to “non-American Marxist regimes”, at least be consistent.
> article shows purpose suggested with convicted prisoners
You presented them as if they just scoop people up off the street and execute them on the spot.
No, that's just America.
I'm asking you to compare the same things and all you did was present a different thing, masqueraded it as a worse thing, failed to find any comparison. If you want to elevate Chinese processes as a charade, thats pretty much what I would expect you to do, but people get railroaded in the US all the time too. So let's just talk about the things completely devoid of due process, or instead of deflecting we can just talk about how the US does not have a better process at all and we should put it under so much more scrutiny.
"We can talk about it" and thats how we got to this outcome, because everyone talked about giving the government all the power, stripping their need for due process, and siding with them by default way too often.