Live data from Hacker News

Oregon, Journalists Sue U.S. over Portland Arrests, Violence

bloomberg.com

101–110 of 217 posts

Re: Oregon, Journalists Sue U.S. over Portland Arrests, Violence

#101
post #82

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Burning cars, so what? Parisians riot like this about every 18 months or so and the state doesn't call out the secret police and somehow the country still exists.

Maybe the fact that there are no consequences has something to do with the fact that it keeps happening every 18 months?

You are in support of secret police extrajudicially detaining citizens? Over a burnt car?

Why can’t law enforcement do this by the book?

Re: Oregon, Journalists Sue U.S. over Portland Arrests, Violence

#102

I see a lot of comments on HN, and elsewhere along the lines of "America is so terrible! Look how the police treat their own citizens!" The difference between the United States and many (most?) other countries is in the article's title: The word "sue." In America, aggrieved citizens have the right to correct their government. It's not always easy. It's rarely quick. But it can be done, and it has been done hundreds o…

It also deliberately hinders progress with things like first past the post elections and the electoral college.

America is flawed from a purely game theory point of view. It has a lot of bugfixes it needs to implement, hopefully sooner rather than later, otherwise it will likely fail.

Re: Oregon, Journalists Sue U.S. over Portland Arrests, Violence

#103

I see a lot of comments on HN, and elsewhere along the lines of "America is so terrible! Look how the police treat their own citizens!" The difference between the United States and many (most?) other countries is in the article's title: The word "sue." In America, aggrieved citizens have the right to correct their government. It's not always easy. It's rarely quick. But it can be done, and it has been done hundreds o…

Do you think they would be protesting still if there was an easier way to petition the government to make actual changes?

Of course not. No one wants to potentially risk arrest and or be seriously injured in the political process. What we're seeing is the last resort of people organizing against a broken political system.

Re: Oregon, Journalists Sue U.S. over Portland Arrests, Violence

#104

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think my point was that it was entirely a bad faith argument. They never cared about preserving freedoms, American democracy or the values that this country stands for. It was just a political tool in a cultural war chess game. It was to drive gun sales and get people out to vote. They talk about having these guns to stand up to government overreach, preserving liberty and freedoms etc. Then when we have literal se…

> They never cared about preserving freedoms, American democracy or the values that this country stands for. I disagree, they do care about personal liberty and safety. If you are infringing on their rights, you aren't an ally. > They never believed it in the first place, or their interpretation is so skewed it's meaningless. This argument is so backwards it's hard for me to grasp. You have people saying "Ban guns! B…

> If you are infringing on their rights, you aren't an ally.

Then they never cared about the values they hold dear. If you believe in "Freedoms" but those freedoms are entirely selective based on political ideology or convenience you believe in nothing. The constitution has no "rights whenever you feel like it" clause.

> "where are the people with guns to defend us???"

I'm actually not saying that at all. I'm not asking for anyone to defend anyone else. I'm noting the irony of how strong the arguments for the second amendment were mostly based around "standing up to government" and how much silence there is about very obvious and illegal government overreach. The exact same behavior that the 2nd amendment proponents literally said that's why they own guns.

It's just political hypocrisy and I'm pointing it out. They were certainly happy to show up in armed groups when their local bar was closed, but snatching people in unmarked vehicles to be taken to secret detention centers is ok?

I actually do not want 2nd amendment people to get involved at all, I feel they aren't well trained, they are mostly unequipped to handle the situation and based on most 2nd amendment people I know, I would not actually want them near any volatile situation. Rights for me and not for thee I guess.

Re: Oregon, Journalists Sue U.S. over Portland Arrests, Violence

#105

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The States should prevail, because under the Constitution the Federal Government does not have police powers and under the 10th Amendment police powers are reserved for the states. Now the limit on the Federal government police powers has eroded slowly (like all limitations on the federal governments power under the constitution), so you could point to the FBI, secret service, ICE/CBP...but if the Federal Government…

When was the last time a 10th amendment argument won the day? Like 200 years ago?

Last time I checked, the fed doesn't have policing power, only states do. This is a huge overstep of states rights.

Re: Oregon, Journalists Sue U.S. over Portland Arrests, Violence

#106

Ironically, giving ideological ammo to the protestors that the system is rotten to the core and needs to be completely replaced. Unmarked rented vehicles kidnapping protestors that lead to interrogations in a secret offsite location sounds a lot like the Stasi or Nazi germany. No one should be ok with this, ever. Where are the "second amendments against tyranny folks"? Oh, they probably support the police. Nice to se…

[flagged]

Libertarians tend to appreciate property rights and want the government to defend them. The rioters don't seem to be in that group.

Re: Oregon, Journalists Sue U.S. over Portland Arrests, Violence

#107

Antifa was declared a terrorist organization. They were seen as co-opting a movement, instigating with violence throughout the country, especially in poor neighborhoods, and attempting to start a race-war. However you may feel about the designation, the means to stop them are deemed serious enough to warrant these measures.

https://theintercept.com/2020/07/15/george-floyd-protests-po...

This looks less credible than the dossier

Re: Oregon, Journalists Sue U.S. over Portland Arrests, Violence

#108

Ironically, giving ideological ammo to the protestors that the system is rotten to the core and needs to be completely replaced. Unmarked rented vehicles kidnapping protestors that lead to interrogations in a secret offsite location sounds a lot like the Stasi or Nazi germany. No one should be ok with this, ever. Where are the "second amendments against tyranny folks"? Oh, they probably support the police. Nice to se…

[flagged]

This looks like straight from reddit: same vinaigrette of emotionally charged buzzwords.

Re: Oregon, Journalists Sue U.S. over Portland Arrests, Violence

#109

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Watch videos on Andy Ngo's Twitter feed. The Portland protesters are engaged in much more violent activities than setting a garbage can on fire.

Hop on a bus and go across the river; go downtown. Neighborhoods which are on the western "downtown" side of the river, but north of Burnside, are fine. Drive up MLK and you'll see nothing out of the ordinary. If you are looking at our city only through the lens of some biased cameraperson, then you are getting a limited view. Go outside. Indeed, go to a park! Only the two parks across from the downtown courthouse ar…

Seriously. If your only source of what's happening is a few selected videos, I'm not surprised people think it's bad here.

Have there been a few incidents, over 50 days of protest? Yes.

Are they common? No.

Do you feel unsafe walking downtown? Only if the police are moving around.

Re: Oregon, Journalists Sue U.S. over Portland Arrests, Violence

#110

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Maybe the fact that there are no consequences has something to do with the fact that it keeps happening every 18 months?

You are in support of secret police extrajudicially detaining citizens? Over a burnt car? Why can’t law enforcement do this by the book?

The initial detention of suspected criminals usually is “extrajudicial” in that it’s done by police without a warrant from a judge. These are federal officers instead of the local police (who should be handling this, except that they’re being hamstrung by local officials’ pandering to the mob). But that doesn’t make them “secret police.”
Post reply on HN