If you close your Mac notebook with a camera cover installed, you might damage your display because the clearance between the display and keyboard is designed to very tight tolerances. Doesn't this sound like an engineering oversight and not a user error? Why are camera covers not just part of the design? My phone camera physically retracts when not in use.
> Why are camera covers not just part of the design? I guess Apple are going to say that they'd rather focus on the security of the OS and computer to prevent unauthorised software from being able to access the camera than on a mostly cosmetic doodad.
Don't close your MacBook with a cover over the camera
941–950 of 990 posts
Re: Don't close your MacBook with a cover over the camera
#942Earlier quoted context omitted.
Are you similarly embarrassed when you close your blinds at night?
I use curtains, but only to isolate the light in the morning. This is a tech forum. I'm much more embarrassed not being able to use Zoom for the first time, rather than a distributed team see me laying on a couch for a brief moment.
Re: Don't close your MacBook with a cover over the camera
#943This statement has a number of issues. First, you have to trust Apple that the indicator _really_ can't be disabled. You also have to trust that there isn't a vulnerability Apple is not aware about that could allow rolling the camera without the light coming on. This has happened in the past [0] and there are known Apple products that are vulnerable, yet the statement never mentions this making you believe it's impos…
> First, you have to trust Apple that the indicator _really_ can't be disabled. You also have to trust that there isn't a vulnerability Apple is not aware about that could allow rolling the camera without the light coming on. I have made this point several times throughout this thread, so I apologize for repeating myself: Every laptop Apple has manufactured in the last ten years has an LED connected to the same circu…
It would be very helpful if you could provide some evidence of that
Re: Don't close your MacBook with a cover over the camera
#944This statement has a number of issues. First, you have to trust Apple that the indicator _really_ can't be disabled. You also have to trust that there isn't a vulnerability Apple is not aware about that could allow rolling the camera without the light coming on. This has happened in the past [0] and there are known Apple products that are vulnerable, yet the statement never mentions this making you believe it's impos…
Re: Don't close your MacBook with a cover over the camera
#945None of the proposed solutions do anything to actually stop the camera from taking a picture of you. Sure, you'll see the indicator light up for 3 seconds. But the attacker still got what they needed. Camera covers have nothing to do with identifying compromise. They are strictly for preventing compromise. This is exactly opposite what a camera indicator light does, and thus the indicator should not be considered a "…
Newer Thinkpads are the only laptops I've seen which bring their own camera shutters. Thinking how often you see people putting tape over their camera, it's quite astonishing build in shutters aren't more common. It's a tiny piece of plastic, costing nothing. Now what I want is a hardware microphone switch, where the off state actually connects to a noise generator.
The Huawei Matebook has the camera as a hidden popup under one of the F-keys.
The Xiaomi Redmibook goes one step further and omits the camera+mic entirely!
Re: Don't close your MacBook with a cover over the camera
#946Earlier quoted context omitted.
Skepticism is healthy.
So is trust. You can’t possibly audit the source of every piece of software that touches your life, even if all of it were open source. Hell, things like Heartbleed or Shellshock sat in OpenSSL / Bash for 5-10 years.
Re: Don't close your MacBook with a cover over the camera
#947Earlier quoted context omitted.
> First, you have to trust Apple that the indicator _really_ can't be disabled. You also have to trust that there isn't a vulnerability Apple is not aware about that could allow rolling the camera without the light coming on. I have made this point several times throughout this thread, so I apologize for repeating myself: Every laptop Apple has manufactured in the last ten years has an LED connected to the same circu…
I trust you absolutely and toally on this. Why wouldn't I? But if you had your entire net worth riding on it, would you trust yourself to be infallibly correct or would you trust something along the lines of a post-it note to be completely sure? You know, if your life depended on it on every single possible model of apple laptop in all circumstances imaginable? (Do we include if your laptop was interecepted and alter…
Re: Don't close your MacBook with a cover over the camera
#948Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not really - there are lots of times when you will not be present with your laptop (think airport security). It's orders of magnitude easier to get access to a mobile device than to setup a camera in every possible location a target might move to. But they'll helpfully carry the device with them.
I really don't think airport security has enough time to open an Apple laptop and rewire the camera.
Re: Don't close your MacBook with a cover over the camera
#949Earlier quoted context omitted.
> I've been thinking about privacy all wrong. I thought it was about preventing access to my data... but Apple has cleared up my misunderstanding and now I know that it's just about being notified when my data is stolen. This comment makes absolutely zero sense in more ways than one. First, in the post Apple also says how you can control exactly which apps have access to the camera in the privacy settings. And, like,…
By the time the light comes on, the horse has left the barn.
Unless you were naked at the moment or doing heroin in the background you can just close the lid or cover the camera then and there...
I care about people filming me without me knowing. Not about someone trying to turn on my camera and me knowing immediately...
If, of course, they can bypass the already present "you need to give an app explicit permission to film" protection...
Re: Don't close your MacBook with a cover over the camera
#950Earlier quoted context omitted.
If someone isn't getting paid, what incentive do they have to patch vulnerabilities in a timely manner?
Not sure what you are asking? As far as I can tell, hackers hack like fish swim. We just do. For a multitude of reasons. For many people, me included, if you wanted to give me a bunch of money to do something and I bit, not that I would nowadays, that could actually lead to a loss of motivation. As for vulnerabilities, many open source projects responds to them much quicker that industry. Say for pride in their work.…