Earlier quoted context omitted.
The headbands were handled via a partnership with Zhejiang Brainco Technology Co Ltd. so donation is far from the right word to use. One of their partner's cofounders is also a Harvard PhD holder so it's hardly a case of the Chinese company just being there to take up space as is often claimed around here. This is a donation in the same way that lots of large American companies are Irish. And the objections from pare…
> The headbands were handled via a partnership with Zhejiang Brainco Technology Co Ltd Which I guess is a subsidiary of the US-based company BrainCo located in Massachusetts. The article describes the provisioning of the headbands as a donation, which I guess makes sense if you're a startup and you want to test a pilot program in a market that might be receptive to your product. The fact that Chinese parents protest…
Why am I not surprised. A U.S. company designs a device that likely does not work but can be used to control people who think it works.
No orders come in, so let's donate it to a Chinese school for a pilot project in the hope that the CCP bites.