Earlier quoted context omitted.
Or perhaps the “hardcore” texts are just poorly written?
Having worked from translations and occasionally originals of some of the Russian texts, they're actually utterly marvelous.
Why are Soviet math textbooks so hardcore in comparison to US textbooks? (2017)
341–350 of 684 posts
Re: Why are Soviet math textbooks so hardcore in comparison to US textbooks? (2017)
#342Earlier quoted context omitted.
> I think on average the difference between a high school student from Russia and US is negligible I went to high school in Russia and then moved to Australia. The difference was immense. It felt like i just dropped 2 year levels. Even the accelerated programs were hopelessly behind the regular curriculum for my age group in Russia. AU/US high school students can't possibly compete against RU or CN high school studen…
The mathematical competence of Australian students relative to international peers has been declining for 16 years. Australia is terrible at maths given its levels of wealth. By one measure students in Kazakhstan perform better. This would be a national scandal if not for the anti-intellectualism that pervades the nation. This is one of the reasons I think Australia (my home country) is in big trouble economically in…
Re: Why are Soviet math textbooks so hardcore in comparison to US textbooks? (2017)
#343Earlier quoted context omitted.
> I think on average the difference between a high school student from Russia and US is negligible I went to high school in Russia and then moved to Australia. The difference was immense. It felt like i just dropped 2 year levels. Even the accelerated programs were hopelessly behind the regular curriculum for my age group in Russia. AU/US high school students can't possibly compete against RU or CN high school studen…
Can agree with similar comparison - when studying at the end of 90s on high school, one student from our central/eastern european class spent 1 year in US. After he came back, he'd tell us how in math they were several years behind for same age group (ie we were running derivations and integrals and they were more on end-of-secondary school level). He was average back home, stellar math student there. Of course, case…
Re: Why are Soviet math textbooks so hardcore in comparison to US textbooks? (2017)
#344Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not the same, but I went from the Polish education system to a British university, and it also felt like it was a massive downgrade. What really surprised me was the core principle at British unversities - "don't assume prior knowledge of anything". It basically meant that on a CS course, they teach you basic level maths, basic programming skills, you spend the entire 1st year of university learning what we learnt in…
> What really surprised me was the core principle at British unversities - "don't assume prior knowledge of anything". My experience was that even if all of the students prior to university studied maths A-Levels, we all studied different topics. Before those two year A-Levels, we all studied different topics in GCSEs. There is so much time wasted giving everyone the same knowledge because of how our system is set up…
Re: Why are Soviet math textbooks so hardcore in comparison to US textbooks? (2017)
#345Earlier quoted context omitted.
> I think on average the difference between a high school student from Russia and US is negligible I went to high school in Russia and then moved to Australia. The difference was immense. It felt like i just dropped 2 year levels. Even the accelerated programs were hopelessly behind the regular curriculum for my age group in Russia. AU/US high school students can't possibly compete against RU or CN high school studen…
Not the same, but I went from the Polish education system to a British university, and it also felt like it was a massive downgrade. What really surprised me was the core principle at British unversities - "don't assume prior knowledge of anything". It basically meant that on a CS course, they teach you basic level maths, basic programming skills, you spend the entire 1st year of university learning what we learnt in…
The rationale is that you want to give 18 year olds the opportunity to pick a field of study that they're excited about now rather than forcing them to choose something based on what kind of education their parents thought proper for them six years ago. If a single "intro to programming" course and a slightly easier first math course can onboard smart students who otherwise would be hopelessly lost, and the only downside is that a couple of better-prepared students feel a bit bored, that's a small price to pay.
Re: Why are Soviet math textbooks so hardcore in comparison to US textbooks? (2017)
#346Earlier quoted context omitted.
> One of the major factors is this weird anti-intellectualism culture that just doesn't exist in Russia. It was the same thing in Romania, at least in the '90s, when I went to school/high-school. It was always strange to me seeing all those American movies of the "nerds"/geeks getting persecuted by the "cool" kids, it certainly didn't happen to kids in my school and I'm pretty sure it generally didn't happen to kids…
I also went to high-school in Romania in '90s. But I think you are wrong on "nerd" thing. Which doesn't mean technical excellence or excellence on a particular subject. "Nerd" means being weird while somehow interested in some technical matters. There were a lot of "cool" kids doing great at math, physics or programming. According to Mirriam-Webster, a nerd is "an unstylish, unattractive, or socially inept person".
> an unstylish, unattractive, or socially inept person
I was definitely unstylish, that's for sure, and I was no Adonis, that was also certain, but the good thing is that back in the day that didn't matter, how you looked and dressed as a kid didn't matter. I only had 2 pairs of jeans for my 4 years of high-school because that was all my parents could afford to buy me back then, but to be honest I wasn't aware of that back then. I'm afraid nowadays things are completely opposite.
Re: Why are Soviet math textbooks so hardcore in comparison to US textbooks? (2017)
#347Earlier quoted context omitted.
> I think on average the difference between a high school student from Russia and US is negligible I went to high school in Russia and then moved to Australia. The difference was immense. It felt like i just dropped 2 year levels. Even the accelerated programs were hopelessly behind the regular curriculum for my age group in Russia. AU/US high school students can't possibly compete against RU or CN high school studen…
Not the same, but I went from the Polish education system to a British university, and it also felt like it was a massive downgrade. What really surprised me was the core principle at British unversities - "don't assume prior knowledge of anything". It basically meant that on a CS course, they teach you basic level maths, basic programming skills, you spend the entire 1st year of university learning what we learnt in…
Re: Why are Soviet math textbooks so hardcore in comparison to US textbooks? (2017)
#348Earlier quoted context omitted.
Huh. That doesn't really match my American experience at all. True, in elementary school I don't recall any word problems -- because everything was practical arithmetic through sixth grade. I think sixth grade was long division? But seventh grade was algebra, and all the Russian examples of word problems look like the stuff we got all the time, seventh grade through eleventh grade. Twelfth grade was calculus, and I s…
[1] has some word problem examples for every year of primary school in England. Year 1 is age 5-6: "Chris is going to buy a cake for his mum which costs 80p. How many 20p coins would he need to do this?" I remember lots of these "coin problems" when I was 5 or 6, since we had plastic money to help understanding, but I don't remember other problems. If I'm equating the grades correctly, the Russian problems appear to…
Re: Why are Soviet math textbooks so hardcore in comparison to US textbooks? (2017)
#349Earlier quoted context omitted.
Comparing the Bay to the American education system as a whole is unfair. In the more rural part of California I grew up we had no options available to us at all. There was the high school, and the more trade-focused high school that only existed as somewhere to put kids who had been expelled from the normal high school.
People do that with Soviet system too. In the 1980s, a disproportionate number of top scientific cadre were born and raised in Moscow and went through the few focused schools there. Born gifted in Govneevka, Kirov obl., pop. 20,000? Good luck.
Our (Romania's) education system was (is) the same, if you were GOOD at something there were plenty of paths that teachers would generally push you towards, special clubs for maths, languages, art (less common). Or schools who would try to group together highly skilled students.
System (after communism) has the same flaw, most rural areas have worse access to education, or better said, much worse quality of education.