Live data from Hacker News

Coronavirus clue? Most cases aboard U.S. aircraft carrier are symptom-free

reuters.com

201–210 of 544 posts

Re: Coronavirus clue? Most cases aboard U.S. aircraft carrier are symptom-free

#201

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Are there any data on the severity of the symptoms? From what I've gathered, but without any hard data, in non-severe cases (i.e. not needing hospitalization) they can vary from a slight sore throat, dry cough and mild fever, to the same with a high fever and general sense of exhaustion.

Non-severe covers bronchitis, pneumonia, etc. My friend (who tested positive but was not hospitalized) described it as "chest pain, difficulty breathing, if I do something silly like walk 10 feet to the kitchen I get lightheaded and hold on to the wall" - for about ten days.

What has gone wrong with this site? Why is this comment grayed out form downvotes? It's a straightforward testimony of real experience, and it doesn't even vary significantly form the consensus set of symptoms.

I see this all the time, on a site that used to be a really good spot for rational discussion.

Re: Coronavirus clue? Most cases aboard U.S. aircraft carrier are symptom-free

#202
post #130

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I feel that the asymptomatic thing is more wishful thinking in places where infection control has failed. Other countries have shown that you can contain the spread of Covid19, even if there are asymptomatic (or more realistic, low symptom severity) cases.

How do we KNOW it's controlled? Asymptomatic people are not, as a rule, tested, so actual infection rates could be massive.

There's a hospital that was testing all women coming in for pregnancies regardless of symptoms and they found a huge number had it.

We really need a cheap and easy test. Probably won't happen for many months. So far only endless promises and lies.

Re: Coronavirus clue? Most cases aboard U.S. aircraft carrier are symptom-free

#203
post #200
post #194

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Well we'll know whether they were asymptomatic or presymptomatic in about five days after the typical incubation period has passed.

The point was more that the "typical incubation period" you are citing seems to be wrong, and not the presentation of the disease. Obviously yes, we'll know more with more data, but that's not an independent variable you're introducing.

What is your basis for claiming that the typical incubation period stated by the WHO is wrong?

https://www.who.int/news-room/q-a-detail/q-a-coronaviruses

Re: Coronavirus clue? Most cases aboard U.S. aircraft carrier are symptom-free

#205
post #59
post #35

All the data points to the fact that coronavirus is more widespread and less deadly than most outlets are reporting (after all, increase the denominator, the % goes down). The countries with the lowest death rates are also the countries that did the most comprehensive testing. Ditto for this aircraft carrier. Of course governments and outlets are fearmongering lest they be accused of not doing enough, but this thing…

Sad to see that everything that tries to bring some positivity to this crisis or a different point of view gets downvoted into oblivion here, including studies and opinions on how we’re doing more harm with certain measures.

really, the issue is no one wants to admit they were wrong.

Re: Coronavirus clue? Most cases aboard U.S. aircraft carrier are symptom-free

#206

Earlier quoted context omitted.

We need widespread antigen testing in a place like Italy or NYC or Sweden. Would be so informative.

> or Sweden Please note that the reporting on Sweden from outside Sweden is completely bananas. The idea of how Sweden is handling the pandemic, alongside cherry-picked data, is being used to argue for whatever lockdown theory people seem to have. The facts though are that Sweden is not an outlier in any way shape or form. Compared to other European countries, Sweden is boringly in the middle of the pack, and showing…

OK that's good to know. Is their government handling it any differently than other countries? Or has it in the past?

Re: Coronavirus clue? Most cases aboard U.S. aircraft carrier are symptom-free

#207

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is the terrible take that will be everywhere in the next few weeks; “I think I had it, therefore I am an expert on the spread of this disease”. There is no data or coherent argumentation here. I’m sorry you were sick, but this isn’t an argument based on facts, it’s an anecdote based off of little that might put people in danger. We need to inoculate ourselves from this argument because we are about to see it eve…

I too am a 'pretty sure I had it already' person. I have also spoken to others that, like me, think they might have had it already. In the weeks before the story went crazy I bought a dehumidifier in the belief that this might help me eradicate a dry cough that would not go away. Not for one moment did I think I had coronavirus at the time, however, as time went on, I began to wonder. Placebo or not, the dehumidifier…

Same, I had it starting January 4th in the SF (North) Bay Area, I'm about 90% sure.

I was probably basically a super spreader too, tbh. I went to work every day, 'cause I tend to power through whatever is thrown at me. At least I avoided shaking hands.

People were even talking about it back then... they didn't know it was Corona, but friends I know who are nurses were saying there is a "weird, bad respiratory infection" going around, and a lot of "atypical pneumonia" and a "really bad flu season but it's a weird flu".

We already had it weeks and weeks before the shelter-in-place in the Bay Area, I'm very sure.

Re: Coronavirus clue? Most cases aboard U.S. aircraft carrier are symptom-free

#208
post #147

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Some percent of confirmed recovered cases never develop antibodies it seems.

Then how did they recover? If your body has no antibodies to the virus then why would the virus ever stop spreading within you?

The cells that generate the antibodies may die later.

Re: Coronavirus clue? Most cases aboard U.S. aircraft carrier are symptom-free

#209
post #130

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How do we KNOW it's controlled? Asymptomatic people are not, as a rule, tested, so actual infection rates could be massive.

No country except Iceland or South Korea knows how many are infected, everyone else's numbers are horribly wrong. But death numbers and hospitalization numbers don't lie. Sure, different countries are counting deaths differently, making it hard to compare them to each other, but the trajectories don't lie. And if you look at growth trajectories, no country is experiencing uncontrolled exponential growth at this point…

> But death numbers and hospitalization numbers don't lie.

Well... there is some indication hospital staff are being directed to assume all cases are COVID19 until proven different. Patients that die with presumptive COVID19 are reported as COVID19 deaths.

So agree, numbers don’t lie. But... handling emergencies effectively can lead to problematic numbers.

Re: Coronavirus clue? Most cases aboard U.S. aircraft carrier are symptom-free

#210
post #203
post #200

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The point was more that the "typical incubation period" you are citing seems to be wrong, and not the presentation of the disease. Obviously yes, we'll know more with more data, but that's not an independent variable you're introducing.

What is your basis for claiming that the typical incubation period stated by the WHO is wrong? https://www.who.int/news-room/q-a-detail/q-a-coronaviruses

It was the contention to which you were responding, in a conversation which was similarly challenging the WHO (and everyone else's) estimate on the severity. And I was pointing out that you can't do that, logically your argument was a tautology. The same effect you were arguing against would argue against your evidence.
Post reply on HN