Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: How do we stop the polarization/toxicicity filling the web?

news.ycombinator.com

691–700 of 859 posts

Re: Ask HN: How do we stop the polarization/toxicicity filling the web?

#691
post #430

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I can't find a recent article on HN containing debates on/against/about/for socialism with banned accounts in them, so it's hard to see the content/context that would then be called toxic, but I do see in your reply that you mention "tedious" and "idealogical flamebait" which is not mutually exclusive to toxic behaviour. I suppose someone could write flamebait or be tedious without being toxic.

How would you know? You can't see any of the comments because the mods generally remove them all.. The reason why YC seems more left-leaning nowadays compared to a few years ago, is exactly what the grandparent of this thread suggested, anyone right-leaning (or libertarian) has been harassed off the site / strongly discouraged from sharing their perspectives.

I find this hard to believe to be honest. HN is owned by a Silicon Valley venture capital investment firm. If anything they lean liberal/libertarian (which indeed can be a bit woke on social aspects, but certainly not when it comes to capital).

Re: Ask HN: How do we stop the polarization/toxicicity filling the web?

#693
post #274

Discussions like this are frustrating to me because they always seem to skip over what feels like a crucial element: Do you know _why_ this uptick has happened? Does anyone? I get the feeling, in general, when people talk about wanting to "Do Something" about this sort of thing, they are always focused on managing the symptom and never focused on addressing the cause. Frequently, when I try to bring this up, the caus…

Just a personal hypothesis, probably colored by my own biases, but I think it has a lot to do with the ad-based economy of the Internet.

The news has evolved to grab attention. It's always done that somewhat, but the Internet and the explosion of options available to people has made it worse than it used to be. Media companies compete for attention by presenting their stories as the most outrageous, most outlandish, most urgent issue ever in the world.

A cute puppy is not just a cute puppy. It's everything you need. It saved me. It is the sole beacon of light and goodness in this cold, heartless world.

Political party X proposing something that a media outlet's demographic dislikes is not just another bill being proposed, it's the enemy trying to destroy everything good in this world. Literally Hitler and so on.

Everything is hyperbolized to the nth degree to try to get it to stand out in the morass of everything else. This trickles down into the way we talk to each other. People don't just disagree, anyone who has a different opinion is literally the greatest villain humanity has ever known and people treat them as such.

The root cause is advertising. Media makes money by attracting eyeballs. They attract eyeballs by standing out with something more urgent than what everyone else is saying. Unless we can provide another way for media to make money that changes their incentives for how they write stories, I expect this will continue.

Re: Ask HN: How do we stop the polarization/toxicicity filling the web?

#694

Earlier quoted context omitted.

And mirrors change behaviours. You don't find people preening before blank walls or open spaces. The mirror informs and provides feedback.

This has nothing to do with what I said.

Incorrect.

Media influence society.

Re: Ask HN: How do we stop the polarization/toxicicity filling the web?

#695
post #500
post #421

> Before, around 2010-2012, people who disagreed would usually leave it at that and walk away respectfully. I don't know what internet you were using, but this does not match my experience. The internet has been a dickfighting playground since at least the 90s. The biggest difference is that comment threads are the majority of how people create content on the internet now and they weren't before.

> The biggest difference is that comment threads are the majority of how people create content on the internet now and they weren't before. Were you not around for newsgroup flame-wars of the early 90s (and probably long before that, if you were among the lucky few that had access)...?

I was. The web went from not most people on it to not most people commenting in threads to now where most people are commenting in threads. Newsgroups fall into the first two categories. So I think you're not really disagreeing with me. I might have missed a word in my statement though?

Anyway my point is mostly to suggest that OP is wrong from ignorance.

Re: Ask HN: How do we stop the polarization/toxicicity filling the web?

#696

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why is this suddenly a discussion about extremism? Because that is my area of expertise and I wish to contribute to the discussion. While not all bigots are extremists, all extremists are bigots. "Warning" and "complaining" is one thing, but advocating for the complete social and professional ostracization of people for increasingly arbitrary reasons I'm not making an argument for cancel culture, which has flaws of i…

> I'm not making an argument for cancel culture, which has flaws of its own. When I talk about extremists I have narrow and specific criteria for inclusion in that category, most importantly the advocacy of genocide. No one would disagree with that definition. Your comment's parent made the point that exclusionary language is used in many in-groups, not just bigoted ones. Your contribution was to say that the parent…

The parent to me comment was complaining about the attitude of left-wing people towards bigots. I'm leveraging my knowledge of extremism to explain why left wingers feel such antipathy towards bigotry: because of the genocidal outcomes which are associated with it and nowadays actively promoted by some folk.

Of course, extremism is by no means limited to one particular ideology. I'm not a fan of Maoists, for example.

I believe one can certainly change their views, although it's hard work.

Re: Ask HN: How do we stop the polarization/toxicicity filling the web?

#697
post #421

> Before, around 2010-2012, people who disagreed would usually leave it at that and walk away respectfully. I don't know what internet you were using, but this does not match my experience. The internet has been a dickfighting playground since at least the 90s. The biggest difference is that comment threads are the majority of how people create content on the internet now and they weren't before.

The term "flamewar" predates all social networks except Usenet. It was not an isolated occurrence in the early days of the net.

Are you responding to something I said? If so I can't tell what.

Re: Ask HN: How do we stop the polarization/toxicicity filling the web?

#698

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Trump was elected. Him winning the election was a shot of weapons-grade steroids into the ass of these regressive movements. It’s actually exactly the opposite. We lurched left in a very short time. As recently as 2007, a plurality even of Hispanics said there were “too many immigrants” in the US. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/02/19/latinos-hav... . Little more than a decade later, every mainstream Dem…

[flagged]

I'm afraid you've been breaking the site guidelines by using HN for ideological flamewar, personal attacks, and the like. We ban accounts that do that, regardless of which ideology they're for or against, so please stop.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

Re: Ask HN: How do we stop the polarization/toxicicity filling the web?

#699

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Encourage people to participate in physical social gatherings that center around non-political issues, like hobbies. I think there is a lot more to this than many people think. If more people participated in hobbies, then they would spend less time on the internet. The time they do spend would be more targeted and focused instead of mindlessly scrolling and scrolling and getting baited and agitated. They would also f…

Damn, this is a great idea... I’m going to try woodworking and make the shoddiest set of chairs one can imagine, but they’ll be my chairs. Could take up to a year maybe of practice but who cares!

I hope this leads you to make friends with the other local woodworking nerds :)

Re: Ask HN: How do we stop the polarization/toxicicity filling the web?

#700
I think one of the driving issues are filter bubbles. The intersecting areas between different political directions is getting smaller and smaller, there exists nearly nothing that is dedicated to healthy discussion between different school of thoughts. Plattforms like youtube are making this worse, because it's recommendation algorithms are pulling people towards more extreme content instead of pulling them more to commonly agreed stuff.

At some moment we will have to agree that big online plattforms aim to change behaviour, create engagement etc. All of this has side effects and these side effects have tangible political consequences. The tangible political consequences have in turn real hard consequences for single persons and groups of people.

We technicians need to think more about the social impact of the things we build. If it is a nice business idea but is a bad idea in the sense of Kant's categorical imperative, just scrap it and move on. Ideas are cheap.

Also: get away from the screen. Meet and talk. Even wkth people with whom you disagree with. Try to keep your own bubble permeable and aim to do the same for others — you will not win your culture war anyways, so don't try to.

Instead try to widen people's horizon by taking them and their ideas seriously, even if it feels stupid to you.

Post reply on HN