Earlier quoted context omitted.
I can't find a recent article on HN containing debates on/against/about/for socialism with banned accounts in them, so it's hard to see the content/context that would then be called toxic, but I do see in your reply that you mention "tedious" and "idealogical flamebait" which is not mutually exclusive to toxic behaviour. I suppose someone could write flamebait or be tedious without being toxic.
How would you know? You can't see any of the comments because the mods generally remove them all.. The reason why YC seems more left-leaning nowadays compared to a few years ago, is exactly what the grandparent of this thread suggested, anyone right-leaning (or libertarian) has been harassed off the site / strongly discouraged from sharing their perspectives.
Ask HN: How do we stop the polarization/toxicicity filling the web?
691–700 of 859 posts
Re: Ask HN: How do we stop the polarization/toxicicity filling the web?
#692Re: Ask HN: How do we stop the polarization/toxicicity filling the web?
#693Discussions like this are frustrating to me because they always seem to skip over what feels like a crucial element: Do you know _why_ this uptick has happened? Does anyone? I get the feeling, in general, when people talk about wanting to "Do Something" about this sort of thing, they are always focused on managing the symptom and never focused on addressing the cause. Frequently, when I try to bring this up, the caus…
The news has evolved to grab attention. It's always done that somewhat, but the Internet and the explosion of options available to people has made it worse than it used to be. Media companies compete for attention by presenting their stories as the most outrageous, most outlandish, most urgent issue ever in the world.
A cute puppy is not just a cute puppy. It's everything you need. It saved me. It is the sole beacon of light and goodness in this cold, heartless world.
Political party X proposing something that a media outlet's demographic dislikes is not just another bill being proposed, it's the enemy trying to destroy everything good in this world. Literally Hitler and so on.
Everything is hyperbolized to the nth degree to try to get it to stand out in the morass of everything else. This trickles down into the way we talk to each other. People don't just disagree, anyone who has a different opinion is literally the greatest villain humanity has ever known and people treat them as such.
The root cause is advertising. Media makes money by attracting eyeballs. They attract eyeballs by standing out with something more urgent than what everyone else is saying. Unless we can provide another way for media to make money that changes their incentives for how they write stories, I expect this will continue.
Re: Ask HN: How do we stop the polarization/toxicicity filling the web?
#694Re: Ask HN: How do we stop the polarization/toxicicity filling the web?
#695> Before, around 2010-2012, people who disagreed would usually leave it at that and walk away respectfully. I don't know what internet you were using, but this does not match my experience. The internet has been a dickfighting playground since at least the 90s. The biggest difference is that comment threads are the majority of how people create content on the internet now and they weren't before.
> The biggest difference is that comment threads are the majority of how people create content on the internet now and they weren't before. Were you not around for newsgroup flame-wars of the early 90s (and probably long before that, if you were among the lucky few that had access)...?
Anyway my point is mostly to suggest that OP is wrong from ignorance.
Re: Ask HN: How do we stop the polarization/toxicicity filling the web?
#696Earlier quoted context omitted.
Why is this suddenly a discussion about extremism? Because that is my area of expertise and I wish to contribute to the discussion. While not all bigots are extremists, all extremists are bigots. "Warning" and "complaining" is one thing, but advocating for the complete social and professional ostracization of people for increasingly arbitrary reasons I'm not making an argument for cancel culture, which has flaws of i…
> I'm not making an argument for cancel culture, which has flaws of its own. When I talk about extremists I have narrow and specific criteria for inclusion in that category, most importantly the advocacy of genocide. No one would disagree with that definition. Your comment's parent made the point that exclusionary language is used in many in-groups, not just bigoted ones. Your contribution was to say that the parent…
Of course, extremism is by no means limited to one particular ideology. I'm not a fan of Maoists, for example.
I believe one can certainly change their views, although it's hard work.
Re: Ask HN: How do we stop the polarization/toxicicity filling the web?
#697> Before, around 2010-2012, people who disagreed would usually leave it at that and walk away respectfully. I don't know what internet you were using, but this does not match my experience. The internet has been a dickfighting playground since at least the 90s. The biggest difference is that comment threads are the majority of how people create content on the internet now and they weren't before.
The term "flamewar" predates all social networks except Usenet. It was not an isolated occurrence in the early days of the net.
Re: Ask HN: How do we stop the polarization/toxicicity filling the web?
#698Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Trump was elected. Him winning the election was a shot of weapons-grade steroids into the ass of these regressive movements. It’s actually exactly the opposite. We lurched left in a very short time. As recently as 2007, a plurality even of Hispanics said there were “too many immigrants” in the US. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/02/19/latinos-hav... . Little more than a decade later, every mainstream Dem…
[flagged]
Re: Ask HN: How do we stop the polarization/toxicicity filling the web?
#699Earlier quoted context omitted.
Encourage people to participate in physical social gatherings that center around non-political issues, like hobbies. I think there is a lot more to this than many people think. If more people participated in hobbies, then they would spend less time on the internet. The time they do spend would be more targeted and focused instead of mindlessly scrolling and scrolling and getting baited and agitated. They would also f…
Damn, this is a great idea... I’m going to try woodworking and make the shoddiest set of chairs one can imagine, but they’ll be my chairs. Could take up to a year maybe of practice but who cares!
Re: Ask HN: How do we stop the polarization/toxicicity filling the web?
#700At some moment we will have to agree that big online plattforms aim to change behaviour, create engagement etc. All of this has side effects and these side effects have tangible political consequences. The tangible political consequences have in turn real hard consequences for single persons and groups of people.
We technicians need to think more about the social impact of the things we build. If it is a nice business idea but is a bad idea in the sense of Kant's categorical imperative, just scrap it and move on. Ideas are cheap.
Also: get away from the screen. Meet and talk. Even wkth people with whom you disagree with. Try to keep your own bubble permeable and aim to do the same for others — you will not win your culture war anyways, so don't try to.
Instead try to widen people's horizon by taking them and their ideas seriously, even if it feels stupid to you.