Live data from Hacker News

Google Brass Set 2023 as Deadline to Beat Amazon, Microsoft in Cloud

theinformation.com

831–840 of 856 posts

Re: Google Brass Set 2023 as Deadline to Beat Amazon, Microsoft in Cloud

#831
post #820
post #441

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Amazon using AWS today is entirely different from the origins of AWS or GCP or Azure being productizations of internal infrastructure. AWS services have always been their own thing, they happen to be useful so today Amazon utilizes them just like anyone else. That doesn't mean the services started internally. https://www.networkworld.com/article/2891297/the-myth-about-...

I think you're being a bit too literal here. Did AWS merely fork the infrastructure that Amazon.com runs on and start selling it, no. But are you telling me that it wasn't built on the lessons learned of amazon.com and that it doesn't share some aspects of how amazon.com worked a the time (with improvements to the bad parts)? I don't know the answer and maybe it was a clean-room implementation but that seems unlikely…

[deleted]

Re: Google Brass Set 2023 as Deadline to Beat Amazon, Microsoft in Cloud

#832
post #475

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> So it's not about being #1, it's about being profitable. The problem Google has with the developer community is largely around the fact that Google has a long history of pulling the rug out from our feet. There have been 3 stories on HN in the past couple weeks alone about Google products which have either been dropped or changed significantly such that they are no longer viable for developers to use. Google has lo…

Amazon have been on HN recently for poor customer service with respect to billing for cloud services: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21694835 Google could potentially win by being the least bad not the best.

Funny enough I just got an email from YoutubeTV last week basically saying the following:

Effective immediately and without warning, YoutubeTV will not have a dedicated channel for Seattle Sounders games (the whole reason I got YoutubeTV was because they were advertising they would do that) and all the previous Sounders games you’ve recorded are now gone effectively immediately (even though, once again, they sold me on their “infinite DVR capacity” that lasts for two years).

Great customer service :-/

Re: Google Brass Set 2023 as Deadline to Beat Amazon, Microsoft in Cloud

#833

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>That is a factually incorrect statement. Oh, so if I cancel my Stadia subscription I can still play the games?

TLDR: Yes. As far as I can tell from [1] the situation is: * Per-game purchase price. * There's a free 1080p streaming tier. * There's a $10/mo 4k streaming tier, which also includes discounts on games and some free games. * However, you won't be able to convert your Stadia-purchased games into local games or Steam codes. * And of course you won't be able to close your Stadia/Google account and still keep your games.…

Thanks for the info. I've been considering a new console purchase and had basically ruled out Stadia immediately due to the subscription requirement. This changes things a bit but I still don't like the fact that I can't play something without a connection to the big Google. I suppose this is just what it feels like to be part of a generation falling out of the marketing window.

Re: Google Brass Set 2023 as Deadline to Beat Amazon, Microsoft in Cloud

#834
post #626

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How much money have they made off of Chromecast?

I'm not sure, but as of 2017 55 million Chromecast devices had reportedly been sold: https://venturebeat.com/2017/10/04/google-has-sold-55-millio... Anecdotally it's pretty popular with folks I know in Columbus, OH - admittedly they tend to be on the tech savvy side.

Units sold != success. Moviepass had a heck of a sales run without ever being successful.

Re: Google Brass Set 2023 as Deadline to Beat Amazon, Microsoft in Cloud

#835
post #824

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This was genuinely not a factor when we signed a 1E8 deal with GCP. What was a factor: (non-exhaustive) * Access to their developers for core services * Discounts available * Quality of support * Access Controls / Audit / Budgeting * Dev Tools around Infra * Future Roadmap Not one of us ever would have chosen the shutdown of Plus/Reader/Wave as a factor. As a startup we hard pivoted in order to succeed. No surprise t…

The thing is that a long term roadmap for a startup is 3 years. So you're going to look for things that are going to get you 3 years down the road cheaply, and then you still aren't that big, you have gigabytes of data, not hundreds of terabytes of data, so pivoting to another cloud provider isn't a big deal. Now, scale up to a company that has a monthly IT spend of 50 million dollars. You aren't moving that much inf…

I suspect the 50 mil / month guys will choose between AWS/Azure/GCP based on credits + discounts because all these clouds will be around 10 years from now. But it's true that I have no experience at that level (only from 0 to 9 mil / month) and the calculus could be completely different. I don't actually know if they could get greater commitments at that spend but it sounds likely. That's more than half a billion a year. Huge.

Perhaps someone who's made the decision on that can share.

Re: Google Brass Set 2023 as Deadline to Beat Amazon, Microsoft in Cloud

#836

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is the entire problem. Swap “Google” for “AWS” in the article and you’d have legions of folks calling foul on the article. Instead, most folks are nodding along to the article going “yep, seems like something Google would do all right…” Google’s problem remains its reputation for turning things off.

The issue is that folks here think GCP is the same thing as Google Reader. That's absurd. Google is currently building a massive $500 million datacenter outside of Reno as we speak, and has 10+ billion invested in their datacenter cloud offering buildout this year alone. GCP and the entire physical infrastructure isn't going to get "turned off" if it isn't #1 in the market in 3 years, that's just silly. https://9to5g…

Even if they don't just "turn off", why would I want to invest in a cloud platform that only staff enough to keep the lights on, while there are cloud platforms out there that continue to provide new features to make my development process less painful?

Re: Google Brass Set 2023 as Deadline to Beat Amazon, Microsoft in Cloud

#837

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>That is a factually incorrect statement. Oh, so if I cancel my Stadia subscription I can still play the games?

TLDR: Yes. As far as I can tell from [1] the situation is: * Per-game purchase price. * There's a free 1080p streaming tier. * There's a $10/mo 4k streaming tier, which also includes discounts on games and some free games. * However, you won't be able to convert your Stadia-purchased games into local games or Steam codes. * And of course you won't be able to close your Stadia/Google account and still keep your games.…

Will account closure or suspension of other google services result in loss of access like the stories we've seen for Gmail?

Re: Google Brass Set 2023 as Deadline to Beat Amazon, Microsoft in Cloud

#838

Earlier quoted context omitted.

AWS was built to support Amazon website which is built in Perl and still internal AWS core code might contain perl. Probably over the years they might have moved slowly to Java. I don't work for AWS so can't say much. Regarding support for .NET whatever AWS does microsoft will always be way ahead of them. Microsoft is not elastic.co that AWS leech on and put the original guys on the side and don't contribute back. AW…

AWS was never built to support amazons website, it was never the result of amazon.com's internal code-base of "hosting" getting made public, it was never amazon's excess peak server capacity, etc, it had virtually no relation to the hosting of amazon.com at all, it was an independent project that might have benefited from a lot of the general design principles of how amazon.com was built, but that is it. All of these…

And they just moved off of Oracle to Redshift after years of effort...

Re: Google Brass Set 2023 as Deadline to Beat Amazon, Microsoft in Cloud

#839

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>When I say how can you trust Google for your infrastructure seeing how they abandon projects, the usual response I get is that they would never do that with their “Enterprise” offerings. And that's when I talk about Google Enterprise Search.

And the order of magnitude price increase of the maps API.

I can’t verify it, but I’ve heard it repeated plenty of times that AWS has never raised the price of an offering.

Re: Google Brass Set 2023 as Deadline to Beat Amazon, Microsoft in Cloud

#840
post #605

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> It's completely nonsensical to consider that a company this big with this much investment already will exit that opportunity. Most big corporations will exit any market, no matter how big if that market does not turn a profit.

Cloud computing is massively profitable.

Which as per my previous comment, should mean companies profiting from cloud will continue to profit from cloud.
Post reply on HN