Live data from Hacker News

No to Chrome

notochrome.org

281–290 of 319 posts

Re: No to Chrome

#281
post #58
post #46

Earlier quoted context omitted.

People need wayfinding regardless of how you get around.

Yeah, Google Maps is surprisingly good when you are on a foreign trip and need to find which bus you need to take to get somewhere. There are probably better country-specific apps to do the same, but GM works in all sorts of countries like Hungary or Japan.

Moovit (for example) has coverage of public transit in both of these countries. So even in that area there are alternatives for Google.

Re: No to Chrome

#282
Jumped from Chrome about six months ago and overall quite impressed with Firefox. My only complaint is that I can't seem to shake my preference for the rounded tabs and UI of Chrome...

Re: No to Chrome

#283

Earlier quoted context omitted.

A powered off computer is completely unhackable. This idea of removing usability in the name of safety has gone way, way too far. It was crap when Mozilla did it, it's crap when Apple does it.

Privacy is half the point of an ad blocker. I don’t think it’s ridiculous to enforce privacy constraints on something that ostensibly protects your privacy.

Given that both Safari and Chrome will continue to allow extensions to inject arbitrary JavaScript into any web page, I don't buy the privacy angle.

Re: No to Chrome

#284
post #76

Interesting, I just moved back to Firefox after many years of using Chrome. I have to admit, it has gotten a lot faster recently, Firefox sync is working very well, and the Firefox Android app is a pleasure to use (being able to install uBlock origin is a huge plus). Anything else I missed on Chrome was easily solved by an addon, or a small tweak on userChrome.css (customizing the browser interface by overriding its…

On Firefox, one thing that really bothers me still is that it's impossible to remove a root domain entry from the omnibox.

Like if I type "re" it completes to reddit.com even though I've deleted that entry. Chrome will respect the deletion and complete to reddit.com/r/all.

Re: No to Chrome

#286
post #144

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm loving pihole https://pi-hole.net/

Pi Hole is a good first layer, but good sites occasionally have bad shit on them, so you can't rely entirely on host-based blocking.

But they rarely host the bad shit themselves, so it still is easily blockable.

Re: No to Chrome

#287
> We can no longer pretend that Google is a positive force in the world.

It's amazing how Google has gone from a "do no evil", where everyone celebrated every new thing Google did to "it is the evil"

Hard to win that brand back once it's tainted. May be the whole alphabet move was so Google's brand wouldn't taint it's other brands. But by association, Waymo is Google-ish and they'll be seen as invading on privacy just like its sibling companies.

Re: No to Chrome

#288
post #137

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I can’t solve highlighting search results in the scroll bar, and apparently I search a surprising amount and am absolutely crippled without scroll bar highlighting, so I’ll stick to Chrome until I can’t (e.g. when content blocking is crippled).

It is mind-boggling that people find their browser experience “crippling” without a feature like scroll bar highlighting. Is it hyperbole, or are you unable to cope in e.g., PDF readers as well? Is your line of work in visually investigating the appearance of words in 1000 page HTML documents?

Nah, I never managed to start using Chrome because of all the small stuff that is missing so I can clearly sympathize even if I personally dislike Chrome.

For me I cannot understand how people can choose to use a browser that doesn't support tree style tabs. I'll gladly sacrifice searcy result markers in the scrollbar as long as I have Firefox extensions.

Re: No to Chrome

#289
I work with chromium using chromes debug protocol (CDP) to do automation. You'd be suprised how much of the browser your dealing with as a facade- they sell things like a headless browser that don't oblige by the most basic of requests given to the browser e.g hide all the scrollbars that in addition to using double the resources and taking twice as long to preform any operations I tell you that thing looks shiny on the surface but their is nothing their I think the work should be done on building and making webkit, blink and gecko better as the referece implementations before we try and yet again make something shiny that can barely do the job it should be

Re: No to Chrome

#290

I work with chromium using chromes debug protocol (CDP) to do automation. You'd be suprised how much of the browser your dealing with as a facade- they sell things like a headless browser that don't oblige by the most basic of requests given to the browser e.g hide all the scrollbars that in addition to using double the resources and taking twice as long to preform any operations I tell you that thing looks shiny on…

also no support for plugins web interfaces on chrome headless meaning every time you want to test a plugin you have to bring up a virtual X11 server to deal with it
Post reply on HN