Live data from Hacker News

$100k/year still might not be enough to buy a home

wsj.com

311–320 of 321 posts

Re: $100k/year still might not be enough to buy a home

#311
post #48

Earlier quoted context omitted.

A 3 hour commute each way is not easy even when you do it only twice a week

Round-trip

But my weekly commuting is less than 5 hours total. And I live in the Seattle area. I will add before I switched jobs to one on the same side of the lakes as I live on, it was 10 hours / week ;-)

Re: $100k/year still might not be enough to buy a home

#312

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Well, its all relative ain't it. Lets just say... Buies Creek, North Carolina. I've been to smaller towns, but I'd say population of 2,942 is small for most people. EDIT: Seems like prices may have gone up in recent years: I'm seeing $800 to $1000 on Rent.com, but there's still a listing or two for $600/month. Or maybe "word of mouth" is still king there. Buies Creek is still reasonably close to the Raleigh metropoli…

Jeeeez, rental prices in the States are INSANE. I live in a dense urban area of ~1 million, on a tropical island. My 550 sqft apartment is ~$520. Hardwood floors, natural gas range and hot water, structure is proof against typhoons up to Category 5 (already experienced several), as well as earthquakes. Gigabit fiber optic internet @$35/month Speedtests around 550MB. Daily flights to practically every major city in As…

That's pretty impressive. I didn't think there were many cities with such good infrastructure and cheap housing prices.

Re: $100k/year still might not be enough to buy a home

#313
post #236

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How much of that $1300/month goes to dental and medical insurance? Because with no family to support, I don't see how you aren't paying close to half that in insurance.

I only just left my job this year. I chose not to get health insurance for rest of year because it's just for myself and I don't use it. (yes, slightly risky but in good health and don't plan to stay funemployed forever) But if I did, there's the premium tax credit, which caps premiums to some % of your annual income. For a single person, 322% above the federal poverty line is $40k with a 9.56% cap, so you'd pay no m…

It's dangerous not to have insurance in the us of course. You are one step away from being devastated because of someone hitting you in a cross walk or suddenly getting a real health issue. My property tax and house payments together are more than 4k a month in the seattle area. That high cost seems less "expensive" than my salary and house appreciation. I just calculated my house has grown 7% a year over 15 years based on estimated price and what houses sell for around me. So it's working out. But it's amazing to look at my salary compared to my costs.

echo "1.07^15" | bc -l

Re: $100k/year still might not be enough to buy a home

#314
post #155

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I actually am thankful for folks who think living outside a major metro area is "mind-numbingly" boring. That means you'll stay in the city with all the other crazy people. See, these low-effort insults work both ways!

Cool. And thanks for car-induced climate change. I can’t wait for the oceans to turn to acid so you can enjoy your homesteading fantasy.

"Estimates suggest that cities are responsible for 75 percent of global CO2 emissions, with transport and buildings being among the largest contributors."

https://www.unenvironment.org/explore-topics/resource-effici...

Re: $100k/year still might not be enough to buy a home

#315

We rented while making good money because it's easier to rent. We're now buying a house. I genuinely like fixing and maintaining houses, so it makes sense for us. However, most people don't. For them, it makes a lot more sense to rent. If you're rich and have a stable source of large income, it's almost always better to rent all your stuff. Not only is rented stuff of higher quality (because you can always have new s…

You don't have to take on any of the risk if anything breaks by forcing them to have renter's insurance. It's something that a lot of newer apartment buildings are doing these days.

You seem to be confused as to the purpose of renter's insurance. Renter's insurance does not cover the cost to repair broken appliances or problems with the apartment that reduce habitability. Not sure where you got that idea from. Renter's insurance covers the renter's property if something in the apartment damages it. For example, if there is a fire that damages your computer, renter's insurance will pay a replacement cost, but will not pay for the repair to the apartment. That is up to the homeowner's policy the landlord pays for.

Source: have rented solely in buildings requiring renter's insurance, and have never filed a claim for things breaking in the apartment. The landlord always fixes it.

More information here: https://www.ipsagency.com/blog/does-renters-insurance-cover-...

Re: $100k/year still might not be enough to buy a home

#316
post #98

I am 34 years old working remotely as data scientist, making $107k TC. My wife who I've been married to for 13 years is a stay-at-home mother as we have two children in grade school. Since they are in the school she is turning in our half-acre into a sustainable garden with chickens. We own our home, are financially comfortable while saving $1500 a month, and travel. We were planning a 2-month trip to Japan this upco…

To add another couple data points: I am substantially younger, make exactly 100k/yr live within commuting distance of a grossly overpriced city full of people I want nothing to do with (read: expensive urban area known for tech and medicine) and made 90k/yr when I bought my house. I live in an city, not a nearly rural suburb, but it's not a rich city (thank god) but it has everything I need. I'm paying a few hundred…

I see that you're very adamant on keeping the location anonymous, but I am vastly curious as to what region you are referencing to. I'm thinking perhaps Baltimore-Washington Area or even Houston.

Re: $100k/year still might not be enough to buy a home

#317
post #177

Earlier quoted context omitted.

When I first moved to the US a decade ago, I got a job in a mid-sized city in Michigan paying $52,000 per year. Had zero problem saving up a down payment in a couple years. Brand new houses were $150k and older, nice home were $90k. Of course the job prospects aren’t as good as a major city, but housing isn’t a major issue.

> When I first moved to the US a decade ago Isn't that around the time all the housing price dropped? > mid-sized city in Michigan That might not be in the list of the places where most people desire to live. > Of course the job prospects aren’t as good as a major city, but housing isn’t a major issue. I think this is not following my comment. The point is not to talk about where affordable places are, but about how…

Point is that there are jobs in places that might not be the most desirable, but you can afford to buy a nice home on a modest salary.

Making it possible for everyone to live in their most desirable city isn't realistic.

Re: $100k/year still might not be enough to buy a home

#319

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm not fond of the slippery slope argument, particularly when it comes from NIMBY's that bought their houses when markets were at a low because nobody wanted to live in these cities. Bay area residents, Seattle residents, etc need to get over themselves and accept reality for what it is. They aren't protecting anything but their own sense of self-worth and the "theory" that bad things will happen if a 3 story apartm…

Reality is what we choose to make it through government. Higher density is not inevitable - it is a choice made by urban planning. That applies to employment as well as housing. I see no problem with a new 3 story apartment complex in my neighborhood, and I find the crime argument silly. On the other hand, if we continue to increase the density and population without corresponding improvements to infrastructure (part…

Higher density is inevitable in mega-cities. Geographic boundaries are just a apart of reality. I agree that transportation is key to this expansion, but the Palo Alto's and Seattle's of the US only have way way to go and that's up.

Re: $100k/year still might not be enough to buy a home

#320

Earlier quoted context omitted.

To add another couple data points: I am substantially younger, make exactly 100k/yr live within commuting distance of a grossly overpriced city full of people I want nothing to do with (read: expensive urban area known for tech and medicine) and made 90k/yr when I bought my house. I live in an city, not a nearly rural suburb, but it's not a rich city (thank god) but it has everything I need. I'm paying a few hundred…

I see that you're very adamant on keeping the location anonymous, but I am vastly curious as to what region you are referencing to. I'm thinking perhaps Baltimore-Washington Area or even Houston.

I'm from NoVA and I'd believe those numbers.

Also how trades can even make 100k -- I used to run data centers and I got tight with a master electrician who did a lot of work for us. He had to work 6 days a week but got paid damn well, and has as much work as he wanted. But it was hard work, not without risk, and six figures doesn't go far in the DC burbs. Something like 6 out of 10 of the wealthiest counties in the US are DC suburbs.

Post reply on HN