Earlier quoted context omitted.
A link has been found to some household chemicals (diethylhexyl phthalate (DEHP) and polychlorinated biphenyl 153 (PCB153)) affecting dogs: https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/fertility-problems...
The world is full of chemicals right now. One day, humanity will look back at the last 100 years (and probably the next 50) and wonder what we were thinking.
Microplastics found in 93% of bottled water tested in global study
201–210 of 383 posts
Re: Microplastics found in 93% of bottled water tested in global study
#202Earlier quoted context omitted.
The bottled water is produced close to where it's sold. The issue is in countries where the water bottling plant takes up lots of the available local water so the poorer citizens can't access it, and they can't afford the bottled water either. This means they don't have access to any clean water. One of Nestle's recent CEOs actually went on record to say say he didn't believe access to clean water should be a human r…
He didnt say that. https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/nestle-ceo-water-not-human...
Full quote:
> “Water is, of course, the most important raw material we have today in the world. It’s a question of whether we should privatize the normal water supply for the population. And there are two different opinions on the matter. The one opinion, which I think is extreme, is represented by the NGOs, who bang on about declaring water a public right. That means that as a human being you should have a right to water. That’s an extreme solution. The other view says that water is a foodstuff like any other, and like any other foodstuff it should have a market value. Personally, I believe it’s better to give a foodstuff a value so that we’re all aware it has its price, and then that one should take specific measures for the part of the population that has no access to this water, and there are many different possibilities there.”
The Snopes article only disputes that he didn’t specifically say the words “Water is NOT a human right”, but backs up what the GP said (that he doesn’t believe it should be a human right).
Re: Microplastics found in 93% of bottled water tested in global study
#203Earlier quoted context omitted.
For practical purpose does it matter? It detects non-water particles(pollution) in twice higher ratio than in tap water and plastic bottled water is sold as way purer than tap water with 1000 time higher price. Basically it's scam.
Plastic bottled water is not bought because it is higher quality. People buy it because it comes in a disposable container.
Re: Microplastics found in 93% of bottled water tested in global study
#204Earlier quoted context omitted.
For practical purpose does it matter? It detects non-water particles(pollution) in twice higher ratio than in tap water and plastic bottled water is sold as way purer than tap water with 1000 time higher price. Basically it's scam.
Plastic bottled water is not bought because it is higher quality. People buy it because it comes in a disposable container.
Re: Microplastics found in 93% of bottled water tested in global study
#205Earlier quoted context omitted.
63 million people is a really, really long tail.
How does this compare to the EU? It's one thing for tap water to not be perfect, it's quite another for it to be as bad as Flint, MI. What's the true distribution here? Making people unreasonably afraid of tap water just seems irresponsible.
Re: Microplastics found in 93% of bottled water tested in global study
#206Earlier quoted context omitted.
For practical purpose does it matter? It detects non-water particles(pollution) in twice higher ratio than in tap water and plastic bottled water is sold as way purer than tap water with 1000 time higher price. Basically it's scam.
Plastic bottled water is not bought because it is higher quality. People buy it because it comes in a disposable container.
Re: Microplastics found in 93% of bottled water tested in global study
#207So, what should we drink?
I always just drink tap water and find it better tasting than bottled. But I guess that varies by where you live. Do most people in the US drink 100% bottled?
Re: Microplastics found in 93% of bottled water tested in global study
#208Earlier quoted context omitted.
Plastic bottled water is not bought because it is higher quality. People buy it because it comes in a disposable container.
In Bali, Indonesia (and many developing countries) you have no choice. Drinking tap water is also health hazard in some countries.
Or SODIS sunlight disinfection.
Re: Microplastics found in 93% of bottled water tested in global study
#209Earlier quoted context omitted.
For practical purpose does it matter? It detects non-water particles(pollution) in twice higher ratio than in tap water and plastic bottled water is sold as way purer than tap water with 1000 time higher price. Basically it's scam.
Plastic bottled water is not bought because it is higher quality. People buy it because it comes in a disposable container.
Re: Microplastics found in 93% of bottled water tested in global study
#210Plastic found in water contained in a plastic bottle. Not really shocked.
>...plastic bottle I'm even confused by this point--given that some of the water (e.g. San Pellegrino) often comes in glass bottles, can we even assume all bottles measured were plastic? It seems like it should be obvious or else it would be a useless study, but I fail to find a single assertion that all bottled water tested were indeed plastic bottles. That and S. Pellegrino has such a low max count compared with ot…