Earlier quoted context omitted.
Doesn't include Kirkland, the Costco brand :(
I have family that buys the Costco brand and of many of the plastics it seems very thin / flimsy compared to some of the more expensive brands. I'd be surprised if it weren't comparable to some of the higher leaching bottles just based on feel and cost. I've always been curious about plastic milk containers vs Tetra Paks as well. Beyond bottled water there are so many other liquids consumed out of plastics I feel as…
Microplastics found in 93% of bottled water tested in global study
111–120 of 383 posts
Re: Microplastics found in 93% of bottled water tested in global study
#112Earlier quoted context omitted.
There’s a lot of logical leaps your making hear. It might not be immediately deadly, but it could have lots of long term subtle effects. For example, it may contribute to cancer rates or obesity. Some people suspect it contributes to low sperm counts among men. All of these would be consistent with the current widespread consumption patterns.
>long term subtle effects The longer term, and subtler the effect is, the safer a substance is. My educated guess is that microplastics are going to cause a lot fewer human deaths and ingury than any of the following natural stuff: Bees, coffee (see acrylamide), peanuts, mosquitoes, arsenic, mushrooms, and bodies of water.
Re: Microplastics found in 93% of bottled water tested in global study
#113Earlier quoted context omitted.
Living in Germany/Berlin and can confirm. Our tap water is excellent and is way cleaner than all bottled water you can buy. Keep in mind, bottled water is also kept around way longer and has the time to „breed“. In tests, the tap water is consistently less contaminated. I recommend everyone to just stick to it. As an anecdote: you can let your tap water be tested for free if you have a newborn to ensure and confirm t…
> you can let your tap water be tested for free if you have a newborn to ensure and confirm that you can use it for baby food without doubt. Without doubt? We just found out that they are microplastics in bottled water, how can you be sure there aren't things in tap water that we haven't discovered yet?
Re: Microplastics found in 93% of bottled water tested in global study
#114Distilled water and glass bottles are the way to go. You can get a small distiller for your home relatively cheaply.
Are you concerned about electrolyte imbalance with drinking distilled water?
A 16oz bottle of San Pellegrino has 20mg of sodium. How can such a small difference in sodium intake (and other minerals) have a meaningful influence on electrolyte levels?
Re: Microplastics found in 93% of bottled water tested in global study
#115I was curious if the micro-plastics could be coming from the bottles they are packaged in. The article says... It's not clear how the plastic is getting into the bottled water — whether it's the water source itself or the air or the manufacturing and bottling process. "Even the simple act of opening the cap could cause plastic to be chipping off the cap," Mason said. I think it's easy to assume it's from the water so…
Re: Microplastics found in 93% of bottled water tested in global study
#116Went looking to see what the comparison to tap water was: > Orb found on average there were 10.4 particles of plastic per litre that were 100 microns (0.10 mm) or bigger. This is double the level of microplastics in the tap water tested from more than a dozen countries across five continents, examined in a 2017 study by Orb that looked at similar-sized plastics. Worse... it's worse than tap water.
The documentary Tapped and Blue Gold both go into all the screwed up thing the bottle water industry does. For countries without clean water, bottled water is not the solution. Better municipal water, more wells and cheaper, low energy water purification around those wells is a much more sustainable solution.
Re: Microplastics found in 93% of bottled water tested in global study
#117I wonder if all the articles talking about the prevalence of microplastics, are in actuality demonstrating the safety of microplastics. If it is in 93% of bottled water, and bottled water is used by millions of people (according to https://www.consumerreports.org/bottled-water/should-we-brea... around 110 Million people in the US avoid drinking tap water), then there has been widespread exposure to microplastics. It…
"From 1973 to 2011, there was a decline of more than 50 percent in sperm counts among men living in North America, Europe, Australia and New Zealand." "The researchers said that they cannot determine from their data what might have caused the decline, but it could be related to environmental or lifestyle factors." https://www.livescience.com/59948-sperm-count-drop-western-m...
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/fertility-problems...
Re: Microplastics found in 93% of bottled water tested in global study
#118Distilled water and glass bottles are the way to go. You can get a small distiller for your home relatively cheaply.
If the microplastics are coming from the water source (not from the actual bottling, wherever the water is coming from, it already has microplastics in it) then this wouldn't do anything, right? Or is there a way to heat the water/steam to such a high temperature that the microplastics "melt" out of it?
Re: Microplastics found in 93% of bottled water tested in global study
#119Earlier quoted context omitted.
Right, I'm curious is some of the outliers at the high end were from older bottles that had been on the shelf longer.
Or perhaps if they were exposed to heat, oxidation, or physical stress even (dropped, squeezed, overly pressurized)
It would be interesting to compare carbonated versus uncarbonated.
Re: Microplastics found in 93% of bottled water tested in global study
#120The bottle is plastic. The lid is plastic too.
When you're opening the bottle, plastic is rubbing against plastic, and then water is pouring over it.
Even glass-bottles typically have a lid that has a plastic sealing layer inside.