Live data from Hacker News

Microplastics found in 93% of bottled water tested in global study

cbc.ca

201–210 of 383 posts

Re: Microplastics found in 93% of bottled water tested in global study

#201

Earlier quoted context omitted.

A link has been found to some household chemicals (diethylhexyl phthalate (DEHP) and polychlorinated biphenyl 153 (PCB153)) affecting dogs: https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/fertility-problems...

The world is full of chemicals right now. One day, humanity will look back at the last 100 years (and probably the next 50) and wonder what we were thinking.

The world is made up of ONLY chemicals, now and forever

Re: Microplastics found in 93% of bottled water tested in global study

#202
post #172

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The bottled water is produced close to where it's sold. The issue is in countries where the water bottling plant takes up lots of the available local water so the poorer citizens can't access it, and they can't afford the bottled water either. This means they don't have access to any clean water. One of Nestle's recent CEOs actually went on record to say say he didn't believe access to clean water should be a human r…

He didnt say that. https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/nestle-ceo-water-not-human...

He did say that he thinks the idea that bottled water is a human right is “extreme”, and that he doesn’t believe it should be.

Full quote:

> “Water is, of course, the most important raw material we have today in the world. It’s a question of whether we should privatize the normal water supply for the population. And there are two different opinions on the matter. The one opinion, which I think is extreme, is represented by the NGOs, who bang on about declaring water a public right. That means that as a human being you should have a right to water. That’s an extreme solution. The other view says that water is a foodstuff like any other, and like any other foodstuff it should have a market value. Personally, I believe it’s better to give a foodstuff a value so that we’re all aware it has its price, and then that one should take specific measures for the part of the population that has no access to this water, and there are many different possibilities there.”

The Snopes article only disputes that he didn’t specifically say the words “Water is NOT a human right”, but backs up what the GP said (that he doesn’t believe it should be a human right).

Re: Microplastics found in 93% of bottled water tested in global study

#203
post #131

Earlier quoted context omitted.

For practical purpose does it matter? It detects non-water particles(pollution) in twice higher ratio than in tap water and plastic bottled water is sold as way purer than tap water with 1000 time higher price. Basically it's scam.

Plastic bottled water is not bought because it is higher quality. People buy it because it comes in a disposable container.

In Bali, Indonesia (and many developing countries) you have no choice. Drinking tap water is also health hazard in some countries.

Re: Microplastics found in 93% of bottled water tested in global study

#204
post #131

Earlier quoted context omitted.

For practical purpose does it matter? It detects non-water particles(pollution) in twice higher ratio than in tap water and plastic bottled water is sold as way purer than tap water with 1000 time higher price. Basically it's scam.

Plastic bottled water is not bought because it is higher quality. People buy it because it comes in a disposable container.

That's how I buy it, but I've encountered plenty of people who think it's of higher quality and prefer it.

Re: Microplastics found in 93% of bottled water tested in global study

#205
post #108
post #92

Earlier quoted context omitted.

63 million people is a really, really long tail.

How does this compare to the EU? It's one thing for tap water to not be perfect, it's quite another for it to be as bad as Flint, MI. What's the true distribution here? Making people unreasonably afraid of tap water just seems irresponsible.

Making people affraid of tap water is the business model of bottled water. US tap water is well known to be bad compared to the rest of the developed world (thanks to marketing).

Re: Microplastics found in 93% of bottled water tested in global study

#206
post #131

Earlier quoted context omitted.

For practical purpose does it matter? It detects non-water particles(pollution) in twice higher ratio than in tap water and plastic bottled water is sold as way purer than tap water with 1000 time higher price. Basically it's scam.

Plastic bottled water is not bought because it is higher quality. People buy it because it comes in a disposable container.

Ignorant comment from someone who's clearly never travelled anywhere. It's actually the exception to be able to drink tap water around the world, not the rule.

Re: Microplastics found in 93% of bottled water tested in global study

#207

So, what should we drink?

I always just drink tap water and find it better tasting than bottled. But I guess that varies by where you live. Do most people in the US drink 100% bottled?

I'm in New York and I don't like tap water at all (a lot of people do though). I used to drink bottled water only, but it was not convenient as I could easily forget to order a new pack, so I switched to Brita filter + tap water. So far so good. I don't believe a $40 filter does a tremendous amount of filtering, but it seems to be OK ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Re: Microplastics found in 93% of bottled water tested in global study

#208

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Plastic bottled water is not bought because it is higher quality. People buy it because it comes in a disposable container.

In Bali, Indonesia (and many developing countries) you have no choice. Drinking tap water is also health hazard in some countries.

Depending on what the hazard is, disinfection tablets can be effective and much cheaper than buying water.

Or SODIS sunlight disinfection.

Re: Microplastics found in 93% of bottled water tested in global study

#209
post #131

Earlier quoted context omitted.

For practical purpose does it matter? It detects non-water particles(pollution) in twice higher ratio than in tap water and plastic bottled water is sold as way purer than tap water with 1000 time higher price. Basically it's scam.

Plastic bottled water is not bought because it is higher quality. People buy it because it comes in a disposable container.

I know lots of people who buy it because they believe it's higher quality. They don't care about the container.

Re: Microplastics found in 93% of bottled water tested in global study

#210
post #17

Plastic found in water contained in a plastic bottle. Not really shocked.

>...plastic bottle I'm even confused by this point--given that some of the water (e.g. San Pellegrino) often comes in glass bottles, can we even assume all bottles measured were plastic? It seems like it should be obvious or else it would be a useless study, but I fail to find a single assertion that all bottled water tested were indeed plastic bottles. That and S. Pellegrino has such a low max count compared with ot…

There's probably plastic involved in the process of extracting/bottling the water.
Post reply on HN