Earlier quoted context omitted.
> The PRC has never governed Taiwan yet essentially no governments call their imperialism what it is and tacitly accept their “unification” language. Taiwan is internationally recognised as being part of China. What happened is that the Chinese government of the time fled there during the civil war. The communists founded the PRC and the ROC government kept control of Taiwan. Since then the question has been who to r…
Look you’re just repeating the same nonsense they are. I don’t even blame you. You’ve heard it so often so that it must be true. The PRC has never governed Taiwan. The ROC hasn’t governed the mainland for close to 70 years. They have separate militaries, currencies, and separate international relations. Hell they even trade with each other. They are two separate countries regardless of what either sides political cla…
I am describing the historical reality.
I think the point of HN is to be able to do that without receiving insults in return.
> They are two separate countries regardless of what either sides political claims.
They are of course are de facto separate states. This does not change a thing to my previous comment.
'China' is made of the mainland and Taiwan, like 'Germany' was made of East and West Germany.
Really, the mistake of the PRC is to have prevented the use of the official name of what Taiwan is as a state: The Republic of China. That would have nipped all those "Taiwan v. China" narratives in the bud.