Earlier quoted context omitted.
News outlets have relied on advertising to make their content accessible and still profitable since the 1830s[0]. It would be in immense industry shift to change from and advertising based model. The GDPR also holds you liable for your outsourced work, which means that any ad network that serves a single malicious ad violating GDPR could make you violate the law. It’s a tough conflict. [0] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/…
The GDPR does not prevent you from serving ads. The ads being served in the 1830s, for example, would not have been in violation of the GDPR had it been in force at the time.
GP says:
> News outlets have relied on advertising to make their content accessible and still profitable since the 1830s[0]. It would be in immense industry shift to change from and advertising based model.
But the immense shift has already been happening, just the other way, -away from a somewhat acceptable kind of contextual advertising model ("put my ad next to the recipes pages") to the current dragnet surveillance behavioural advertising model.
What is needed isn't much more than going back to 2009 or when it was Google bought Doubleclick, when the separation between shady spyware, passive ads and content was somewhat clear.
Of course this would be expensive, in the same way that getting your buildings fire safe would be expensive after you've relied on lack of inspections to rake in rents for years from cheap housing.
Meta: HN could need a feature to "flag" when someone is abusing downvotes like on parent comment. I can always send a mail as I sometimes do, but I guess a way to flag for general moderator attention would improve reporting of such abuses.
The comment is trivially easy to prove right, points out an important detail and is still downvoted.