Earlier quoted context omitted.
In a world where every other tech company swindles and manipulates consumers at every opportunity, I'm happy that at least one is incentivized to do the opposite, and has the power to do so.
Apple swindles and manipulates the user to buying a new device whenever there is any fault at all because everything is glued and soldered together so fixing anything requires buying half of the device.
Apple Sign In
341–350 of 544 posts
Re: Apple Sign In
#342Disposable, anonymous email forwarding is a massive step forward for privacy. I know we've all been doing it for a while, but this on a consumer level is fantastic.
I've been trying for some time to explain to my friends and family how a unique email/password + 2FA strategy is the best thing to do and how it would allow them to cut one in case it gets leaked. I guess I will just tell everybody about "Sign in with Apple" now, it will be easier.
Re: Apple Sign In
#343Earlier quoted context omitted.
Mozilla dropped the ball on this? They never had an opportunity to do this. Apple will only succeed by bulling developers that want to stay in the AppStore. Mozilla doesn’t have the market share or financial leverage to do anything like this.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mozilla_Persona > Mozilla doesn’t have the market share or financial leverage to do anything like this Precisely. There was very little incentive for websites to adopt it at the time; Apple has a lot more power.
Re: Apple Sign In
#344Earlier quoted context omitted.
that smells like an anti-competitive behavior. obviously apple has considered this and is forging on anyway. good for them.
Competition is not anti-competitive. Excluding other third party sign on options would be problematic if Apple were abusing a dominant position among smartphone makers, which is not the case by any objective measure.
Re: Apple Sign In
#345Earlier quoted context omitted.
In a world where every other tech company swindles and manipulates consumers at every opportunity, I'm happy that at least one is incentivized to do the opposite, and has the power to do so.
Apple swindles and manipulates the user to buying a new device whenever there is any fault at all because everything is glued and soldered together so fixing anything requires buying half of the device.
I'm not sure how this is manipulating to get me to purchase a new phone.
Re: Apple Sign In
#346Earlier quoted context omitted.
Apple ID as SSO, iMessage Profile, Memoji, and Apple Pay. Apple is near FB Messenger parity, now that it functions as an account for external services. It's an extremely strong move on Apple's part, especially considering how close to it they have been for a while. They sure like taking their time sometimes.
They're close to parity with a giant exception that it's not available to the overwhelming majority of Facebook users.
Re: Apple Sign In
#347Earlier quoted context omitted.
Presumably such services won't implement Sign In With Apple in the first place. People will accept it because they want the sheer quantity of users Apple provides. The useful thing about Apple is that they can force people to do things they don't particularly want to do, like accept anonymous e-mail addresses or stop using Flash. (unfortunately this is also the bad thing about Apple)
"[Sign In with Apple] will be required as an option for users in apps that support third-party sign-in when it is commercially available later this year." https://developer.apple.com/news/?id=06032019j
Re: Apple Sign In
#348According to the App Store review guidelines update posted today, Sign In with Apple will be required for any iOS app that implements a single-sign in button. "Sign In with Apple will be available for beta testing this summer. It will be required as an option for users in apps that support third-party sign-in when it is commercially available later this year." https://developer.apple.com/news/?id=06032019j
Therefore, anyone offering Facebook/Google login will also have to accept Apple's anonymized forwarded email addresses, like fc452bd5ea@privaterelay.appleid.com.
This sounds like a tremendous headache that I really don’t want to worry about. But Apple is looking to leverage their power in the app market to force me to implement a tool I may not be interested in as a merchant?
I despise being strong armed. I hope the EU crushes this.
Re: Apple Sign In
#349Re: Apple Sign In
#350On the downside if I use Apple Sign In on apps I probably won't be able to sign in to that application on my Android devices.