A subtle way to suggest fasting ?
If you stop eating for a few weeks it probably does lower your chances of getting cancer significantly.
Is everything we eat associated with cancer? A systematic cookbook review
41–50 of 67 posts
Re: Is everything we eat associated with cancer? A systematic cookbook review
#42Wow, that was quite a read. What does seem to stand out is the danger of negative results not being published. 99 studies look at an ingredient, find nothing, don't publish. Through pure chance, the hundredth study finds a correlation, and everyone is immediately convinced that yet another ingredient is unhealthy.
P values don't work at all if there's a lot of people working in a field!
Re: Is everything we eat associated with cancer? A systematic cookbook review
#43“Statistically significant results were more likely than nonsignificant findings to be published in the study abstract than in only the full text (P < 0.0001).“
Re: Is everything we eat associated with cancer? A systematic cookbook review
#44Earlier quoted context omitted.
Well, that's basically true, isn't it? Oxygen is extremely reactive and was poisonous to early life: https://slate.com/technology/2014/07/the-great-oxygenation-e...
It still is. If you live at sea level, your chances of getting lung cancer are much higher that of you live at higher elevations.
Re: Is everything we eat associated with cancer? A systematic cookbook review
#45See also Kill or Cure , a comprehensive index of every Daily Mail article claiming that something causes or prevents cancer. https://kill-or-cure.herokuapp.com/
Looks like it does subject/verb plurality agreement based on the presence of an 's' at the end of the subject. Thus: "Asbestos prevent cancer". Heh. Software.
Re: Is everything we eat associated with cancer? A systematic cookbook review
#46Wow, that was quite a read. What does seem to stand out is the danger of negative results not being published. 99 studies look at an ingredient, find nothing, don't publish. Through pure chance, the hundredth study finds a correlation, and everyone is immediately convinced that yet another ingredient is unhealthy.
The study will fail to replicate.
Re: Is everything we eat associated with cancer? A systematic cookbook review
#47Earlier quoted context omitted.
https://lowres.cartooncollections.com/doctors-medical-parano... The SENS people say, if you live long enough, you will eventually have cancer.
I was under the impression that everyone has cancer all the time at about the same rate the body can fight it before it becomes an actual, detectable problem.
Re: Is everything we eat associated with cancer? A systematic cookbook review
#48See also Kill or Cure , a comprehensive index of every Daily Mail article claiming that something causes or prevents cancer. https://kill-or-cure.herokuapp.com/
Looks like it does subject/verb plurality agreement based on the presence of an 's' at the end of the subject. Thus: "Asbestos prevent cancer". Heh. Software.
Re: Is everything we eat associated with cancer? A systematic cookbook review
#49Re: Is everything we eat associated with cancer? A systematic cookbook review
#50You can basically dump all mouse studies, since the standard kibble was something high sugary/starchy. Add fat -> cancer; add more sugar -> cancer...; add more protein -> cancer Epidemiological stuff is flawed as well. Unless the people are kept in a closed ward and every meal is kept under close observation, it's probably not "clean" data. There is hope though... annecdotal evidence seems to point towards unprocesse…