Sounds like a very standard Google experience. To anyone stuck in a similar hell in the future - once the company has demonstrated that they aren't willing to help, there is no point continuing down that road. Escalate it to your credit card provider (with documentation) and they will clear it up pretty quick.
It seems that anything that has any sort of customer service component is not Google's forte.
Leaving Google Fi
161–170 of 296 posts
Re: Leaving Google Fi
#162Earlier quoted context omitted.
There is only one customer at Google, and it is the people buying ads. Astonishingly enough, even at moderate ad volumes there's still no customer service. You have to start spending truly astronomical amounts of money before an actual rep will attempt to help you with essentially any problem. So to Google, "actual customer" means "someone spending six figures per month on advertising on our platform". As far as I am…
I have lots of criticisms of Google, but let's not spread misinformation. GCP does offer paid support options, depending on your business requirements. If it's critical for your business then you can afford to pay a few extra hundred dollars a month
Re: Leaving Google Fi
#163Google Fi support went down the drain when they expanded. I had a recent experience with my mother's phone being stolen while she was at a hospital, here's the summary after it was confirmed missing and police contacted, with a lot of redundant messages removed. 1st chat with agent Me Hi, my mother's phone was stolen, I'm tracking it on find my phone. Them: Sorry to hear that, we can black list the phone but you must…
Re: Leaving Google Fi
#164I'm a long-time Google Fi customer and moderate another community about Google Fi. Some of the criticism about Google not being as customer focused is valid, but the two biggest problems with Google Fi are: * The dependence on rigid processes. Customer support reps are cogs in a machine with no ability to override automated actions or to circumvent when processes go awry. * Google does absolutely zero of the inventor…
Re: Leaving Google Fi
#165Earlier quoted context omitted.
" We're banning you for demanding a refund for items not delivered " seems like a great way to attract regulatory scrutiny: > By law, a seller should ship your order within the time stated in its ads or over the phone. If the seller doesn’t promise a time, you can expect it to ship your order within 30 days... If the seller is unable to ship within the promised time, it must notify you, give a revised shipping date a…
[flagged]
Re: Leaving Google Fi
#166Re: Leaving Google Fi
#167Earlier quoted context omitted.
Having been through several Jeff escalations on the seller side of things, the reality is very different from the romanticized version in the public mind. Maybe it worked that way a decade ago when the volume was lower. Now sending a Jeff message just goes to a specialized team that's only slightly more competent than whoever would otherwise handle the issue. Have had several times where no resolution was given at al…
The seller is not the customer.
I think the digital/sharing/on demand/fulfillment economy needs new definitions for these concepts.
Re: Leaving Google Fi
#168Earlier quoted context omitted.
It seems that anything that has any sort of customer service component is not Google's forte.
Google is shit in meatspace. It has been demonstrated too many times. They'd better hope the day that they'll only need to interface with bots arrives soon.
Re: Leaving Google Fi
#169This is the difference between Google and Amazon. People have lots of criticism of Amazon, some I even agree with, but working here[0] one of my favorite little cultural things is that customers can and do email Jeff when stupid things happen. And Jeff reads them. Every now and then he'll forward one of them to a senior VP with a simple "?" added to it.[1] That question mark indicates two things: that you have 24 hou…
1. emailing "Jeff" amounts to emailing a central triage team, which doesn't necessarily sound better than emailing, say, a well-organized, decentralized support team where the customer knows more immediately who is capable of addressing their particular problem.
2. everyone who works at Amazon is deeply scared of Jeff. fear is a motivator, but maybe it's not the best motivator.
3. sending someone in an organization a "?" is not actually very helpful. there's very little information there.
4. it sounds like people within Amazon are fighting fires and the guy at the top is the one with the torch. and that seems to work ok. but, that would seem likely to create a haphazard organization and products that are not insanely great. strong, insanely great design is not prioritized.
Re: Leaving Google Fi
#170Earlier quoted context omitted.
Amazon support has never been anything less than stellar for me. Edit: Someone downvotes my experience? Wut?
> Amazon support has never been anything less than stellar for me. > Edit: Someone downvotes my experience? Wut? This conversation is about Google. That's like saying, "Costco has great customer support though," in a conversation about travel agents.