Earlier quoted context omitted.
>Most IoT devices are not designed to be used for extended periods without internet access and a continuous stream of updates. But you could design one with a manual fallback option. Doesn't seem foundational to me. Nothing about an IoT design prevents one from doing that. >The latter means that unlike traditional home hardware, once you install "smart" devices you're at the mercy of the business plans of the vendor.…
> But you could design one with a manual fallback option. Doesn't seem foundational to me. Nothing about an IoT design prevents one from doing that. Certainly I could (or at least someone with the engineering skills could), but the actual IoT companies don't . My impression of IoT devices (do not want) is based on what actually exists, not on what could theoretically exist.
That is incorrect. There are several IoT products with manual fallback options on the market. I don't even know why you're disagreeing to be honest. You don't like IoT devices, I got that part.