Live data from Hacker News

Warp – Mobile VPN

blog.cloudflare.com

481–490 of 500 posts

Re: Warp – Mobile VPN

#481

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I disagree with this statement. We haven't pushed incompatible standards or any other nonsense. We've literally pushed out the latest standards and enabled more encryption (see Universal SSL making SSL free years before Let's Encrypt; see enabling IPv6; enabling HTTP/2; etc. etc.). As for HTTP/3... so will we. See: https://blog.cloudflare.com/http-3-from-root-to-tip/ , https://blog.cloudflare.com/the-road-to-quic/ an…

Fair point. I especially appreciate that even Workers is based on a W3C standard, when it could have been a proprietary API. However, Cloudflare has also adopted and promoted at least one standard that adds complexity for dubious benefit, specifically DNSSEC, which tptacek has repeatedly criticized (e.g. [1]). Moreover, Cloudflare is encouraging both providers and consumers to bypass the public Internet as much as po…

> DNSSEC, which tptacek has repeatedly criticized

FWIW, tptacek's argument in that thread seems to be premised on certificate pinning being widely deployed[1], which it's not, and it seems at this point like it never will be[2].

[1]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10553608

[2]: https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/forum/#!msg/blink-d...

Re: Warp – Mobile VPN

#482

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I mean, for DIY you only need one because you're only one user . Pick a VPS host with a data center near you... done.

If you’re traveling a lot, which is often the use case for a VPN, this immediately becomes annoying.

or a feature

Re: Warp – Mobile VPN

#483
@eastdakota, I have 1.1.1.1 at router level but when I installed the app it told me I wasn't using 1.1.1.1.

Is this by design or there is possibly something wrong with my router's DNS setup?

Re: Warp – Mobile VPN

#484

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Nope. We want you to use our VPN because we think it'll make your mobile Internet experience better (faster and more secure). That turns into an upsell opportunity to us and makes our core service (which people pay us for) more valuable.

Damn. Cloudflare's super nice customer-centric stance on this product is killing me. I quit my FAANG job just this past month to build something similar.

OT: What's going on in your profile? is this some sorta custom way to follow other user's posts?

Re: Warp – Mobile VPN

#485
Very interesting. I've got environments where I have no control over how DNS is assigned, so I've wanted to set my phone to point to 1.1.1.1 but that also means I must have a static IP (it's DHCP or static, I can't only change DNS), but when I use static I run into a significant battery drain.[1] Using an app to work around that is a bit of a heavy hammer, but I'm gonna give it a shot.

https://issuetracker.google.com/issues/112927337#comment45

Re: Warp – Mobile VPN

#487

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> exceptionally well-written product announcement Yup... a rare beast these days. My niece is a gifted writer - one of less than a half dozen that I personally know. She graduated recently and had her pick of several positions due to her portfolio of work.

> had her pick of several positions due to her portfolio of work Aside from previous job experience, what sort of things are in a portfolio like this?

She did freelance work while getting her degree (mostly friends/family small business promos, article, press-releases) and received a ton of positive feedback that she was able to use.

Re: Warp – Mobile VPN

#488

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Fair point. I especially appreciate that even Workers is based on a W3C standard, when it could have been a proprietary API. However, Cloudflare has also adopted and promoted at least one standard that adds complexity for dubious benefit, specifically DNSSEC, which tptacek has repeatedly criticized (e.g. [1]). Moreover, Cloudflare is encouraging both providers and consumers to bypass the public Internet as much as po…

> DNSSEC, which tptacek has repeatedly criticized FWIW, tptacek's argument in that thread seems to be premised on certificate pinning being widely deployed[1], which it's not, and it seems at this point like it never will be[2]. [1]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10553608 [2]: https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/forum/#!msg/blink-d...

No. I like pinning (which is widespread outside of browser applications) and certainly it's better than DNSSEC, but my argument holds together just fine without it.

It hardly matters at this point, though. DNSSEC is a dead letter. It's over. Stick a fork in it. It'll be around indefinitely for performative nerds to performatively noodle with --- lots of dead IETF protocols are! --- but Cloud Flare is likely to be the largest company ever to use it (and they're the exception that proves the rule, since they sell DNSSEC services).

Re: Warp – Mobile VPN

#490
post #194

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"big in the CDN market" is very different to "has enough pull to significantly centralize the internet like Google or Amazon".

CDNs are literally the other thing (aside from Public Cloud providers) that are centralizing the internet. You statement is the exact opposite of reality.

That’s a very harsh dismissal and I don’t think it holds up well because it ignores the difficulty of switching. You can switch CDNs quickly, without needing any user actions, whereas it’s considerably more work to switch cloud providers and even harder to get users to switch their usage.
Post reply on HN