Earlier quoted context omitted.
The open web is more than just a browser. The cost is minimal when you have your own infra instead of AWS’ bandwidth gouging.
Another user pointed out that Firefox Send is written to use an Amazon S3 compatible API to run. That could mean that Mozilla is using AWS for the service. https://github.com/mozilla/send#requirements
Firefox Send: Free encrypted file transfer service
431–440 of 542 posts
Re: Firefox Send: Free encrypted file transfer service
#432Re: Firefox Send: Free encrypted file transfer service
#433Earlier quoted context omitted.
Minio is your friend. (S3 compatible self-hosted, open-source object store). I recently implemented a text/snippet sharing tool that uses Minio instead of S3, because I like to self-host everything. https://minio.io/
I use this with Seafile to store data in Azure Blob storage - it was incredibly simple to setup and has been rock solid since. Highly recommended!
Re: Firefox Send: Free encrypted file transfer service
#434I can't believe that there isn't a simple service to transfer data between my cellphone and my computer without going through the internet. iTunes is terribly bloated, MTP is a mess, and Bluetooth is slow and frustrating. Back in my hacker day I used to have an SSH server open on my cellphone and use it to transfer files back and forth with my computer. Why isn't there a mainstream service like that?
The correct way to do this is to configure your phone to emulate USB mass storage and then connect with a USB cable.
Your phone looks like a thumb drive. It's the easiest workflow in the world.
Unfortunately, this workflow is off limits because of some licensing requirement from MS for fat32 (or something) which is why neither android nor ios has this very basic, simple feature.
Re: Firefox Send: Free encrypted file transfer service
#435Re: Firefox Send: Free encrypted file transfer service
#436Re: Firefox Send: Free encrypted file transfer service
#437In the not so recent past, HN'ers loved to quote tptacek's legendary rant about how in-browser JavaScript crypto is fundamentally broken[0]. What changed? Is that rant finally outdated? Couldn't Mozilla at any time serve a corrupted JS bundle (with or without their knowledge) which would leak the key somewhere, silently replace the encryption by a noop, etc? I ask out of interest, not skepticism. I much prefer an int…
Re: Firefox Send: Free encrypted file transfer service
#438That checkbox is #1 reason I only use Firefox.
[1] Developer console log output: "Failed to register/update a ServiceWorker for scope ‘https://send.firefox.com/’: Storage access is restricted in this context due to user settings or private browsing mode. main.js:38:10 SecurityError: The operation is insecure."
Re: Firefox Send: Free encrypted file transfer service
#439Earlier quoted context omitted.
I use this with Seafile to store data in Azure Blob storage - it was incredibly simple to setup and has been rock solid since. Highly recommended!
I'm curious, how do you use both seafile and minio?
In my case I have Minio in front of Azure blob storage, so Seafile is storing data in that.
I host Seafile and Minio using Docker Compose, which was super-simple to get started with.
Re: Firefox Send: Free encrypted file transfer service
#440Very clean and nice, but how is this financed? That is, who's paying for the server storage and the bandwidth?
Secondary - In support of Revenue KPI
We believe that a privacy respecting service accessible beyond the reach of Firefox will provide a valuable platform to research, communicate with, and market to conscious choosers we have traditionally found hard to reach.
We will know this to be true when we can conduct six research tasks (surveys, A/B tests, fake doors, etc) in support of premium services KPIs in the first six months after launch.