I can't believe that there isn't a simple service to transfer data between my cellphone and my computer without going through the internet. iTunes is terribly bloated, MTP is a mess, and Bluetooth is slow and frustrating. Back in my hacker day I used to have an SSH server open on my cellphone and use it to transfer files back and forth with my computer. Why isn't there a mainstream service like that?
Firefox Send: Free encrypted file transfer service
81–90 of 542 posts
Re: Firefox Send: Free encrypted file transfer service
#82Earlier quoted context omitted.
Why is it a necessity to store information for 90 days? Why not 10 or 30?
> Why is it a necessity to store information for 90 days? Why not 10 or 30? Is there something special about 10 or 30? (You wouldn't ask the same question about 10 or 30?)
I understand the need to keep logs to thwart abuse, but with longer lengths you're just helping law enforcement.
Re: Firefox Send: Free encrypted file transfer service
#83How do they pay for the storage costs? What's the upside for Mozilla?
Re: Firefox Send: Free encrypted file transfer service
#84I can't believe that there isn't a simple service to transfer data between my cellphone and my computer without going through the internet. iTunes is terribly bloated, MTP is a mess, and Bluetooth is slow and frustrating. Back in my hacker day I used to have an SSH server open on my cellphone and use it to transfer files back and forth with my computer. Why isn't there a mainstream service like that?
Re: Firefox Send: Free encrypted file transfer service
#85I must say I am disapointed. I thought this would be some cool realtime system to send from browser to browser, using WebRTC or something. Something that doesn't involve them paying for file servers, by the way. I believed in Mozilla ! But no, here we are and I just don't see the difference between this and Mega. EDIT: except for the auto-deletion trick that addresses the piracy problem. But still...
But that would require more brain and effort. Since many users are usually behind a NAT, some NAT-traversal is neccessary. Combined with a robust detection (for shitty networks) and fallback to "normal" servers ... you get the idea.
Re: Firefox Send: Free encrypted file transfer service
#86I've been building a fully featured CLI tool for Firefox Send, supporting this new release. For anyone that is interested: https://github.com/timvisee/ffsend
Re: Firefox Send: Free encrypted file transfer service
#87Re: Firefox Send: Free encrypted file transfer service
#88That is, who's paying for the server storage and the bandwidth?
Re: Firefox Send: Free encrypted file transfer service
#89I'm onboard as a regular user of send.firefox.com. How does Mozilla have the money to offer this for free?
Re: Firefox Send: Free encrypted file transfer service
#90How to they pay for the storage costs?
Elseways, It might be that they have bigger plans with it. This might be just a product to learn about market potentials.
Mozilla's manifesto is all about the Internet and Internet privacy. File sharing is one of the areas where the internet is losing privacy.