Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm not even bringing feelings or faith into this discussion though. This is pure logic my friend. It is not rational to "believe" that an object, a thing, a complex structure, can come into existence without being intelligently designed in some manner. That something as intricate and complex as the universe just came to be randomly, for no reason, and with no architect of some sort.
Where this line of thinking falls apart is realizing you must, due to the same logic, explain the architect's coming into existence.
It's true that all roads from there will eventually lead to abandoning the logic and essentially saying "just because".
imho the leap of faith in assuming the architect(s) came into existence by divinity (just because) is more satisfying than the one in assuming there is none.