Earlier quoted context omitted.
By "it" do you mean Bitcoin? Because it is designed to be deflationary? Because its (energy cost) overhead is still sky high and likely to remain reflected in prices? Because it is the "brand name" market with whatever caché remains to that name reflecting in prices? Because sunk costs of existing investors want to keep the price high for as long as possible? Those are just a few of the more obvious reasons. Not that…
>Because its (energy cost) overhead is still sky high and likely to remain reflected in prices? This is a huge fallacy.
https://digiconomist.net/bitcoin-energy-consumption
https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2017/12/bitcoins-insane-...
Yes, it's down from the bubble peak in mining, but it is still a massive over-expenditure of energy per value. Right now, still, according to the Digiconomist stats above, ~15 average US homes can be powered for a day with the energy spent to make a single Bitcoin transaction block. That's a considerable amount of energy.