Earlier quoted context omitted.
>Declare facial recognition inadmissible, and its use will drop off. no, they will just use it for parallel construction instead
But that's at least illegal. If it's inadmissible, they won't likely get funded. And if they try that, it's fruit of the poisonous tree and a good lawyer should be able to ferret that out. I didn't say it's a perfect solution. But it might at least help.
What makes you think that?
What do you think about how the Investigatory Powers Act 2016 applies to parallel construction of evidence?