The issue they are going to run into is that they are automatically going to be labeled a porn site. As such they will automatically lose the top tier of advertisers and payment processors. In addition, because they are new and probably won’t have the filtering systems in place, very offensive content including cp will likely get posted. This will further make them a pariah to the main stream internet with app stores…
Tumblr was pretty terrible at handling CP reports. Like, I reported someone who posted sexually explicit photos supposedly of themself whilst admitting they were underage, and it took two months for Tumblr to send a form message saying they were looking into it and might or might not do something.
Tumblr refugees trying to save its NSFW content
41–50 of 66 posts
Re: Tumblr refugees trying to save its NSFW content
#42Earlier quoted context omitted.
Have you seen all the kids around? Let’s just say there has always been a lot of sex. What changes is the discussion around it.
studies show that kids today have less sex.
Re: Tumblr refugees trying to save its NSFW content
#43They should name the new platform Relbmut (inverse of Tumbler).
Re: Tumblr refugees trying to save its NSFW content
#44Re: Tumblr refugees trying to save its NSFW content
#45It's interesting to see Tumblr described in many articles/forums as primarily for pornography. Tumblr has been the biggest user acquisition channel (and a free one, at that) for my startup, which has nothing to do with pornography. We've gained tens of thousands of users in a few days from a single user post, and several user posts have accumulated 50,000+ notes. This is all thanks to the strong accessibility groups…
Yeah , but how do you think these users got into tumblr in the first place?
The content you see on Tumblr is determined by who you follow. If you use Tumblr and only see porn, it's because you're only looking for porn.
Re: Tumblr refugees trying to save its NSFW content
#46That's cute. The Tumblr Refugees don't think that Twitter is censored.
It’s not. The only caveats are that you have to mark porn as porn, and you’re not allowed to get paid for it. Source: https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/xwavkq/j
Re: Tumblr refugees trying to save its NSFW content
#47Earlier quoted context omitted.
Via subreddit rules. If you link your work and then say “I made this” you get criticized for self promotion. You almost always need a 3rd party to introduce your work.
The rules are actually global, not subreddit based. If more than 10% of your posts are OC you can be banned. >You should submit from a variety of sources (a general rule of thumb is that 10% or less of your posting and conversation should link to your own content), talk to people in the comments (and not just on your own links), and generally be a good member of the community.
In fact Reddit now by default asks if content is "OC" (original content) or not on posts.
Re: Tumblr refugees trying to save its NSFW content
#48Earlier quoted context omitted.
studies show that kids today have less sex.
As compared to 30 years ago. if you follow the graph on the article that I assume you are referring to that was on the front page a few weeks ago, the number of sexual partners in the 1900s was 2-3. Its predicted that number of sexual partners will be 8 for this generation compared to last generations 9. Not a big jump in my perview.
https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2018/12/the-sex...
Re: Tumblr refugees trying to save its NSFW content
#49The issue they are going to run into is that they are automatically going to be labeled a porn site. As such they will automatically lose the top tier of advertisers and payment processors. In addition, because they are new and probably won’t have the filtering systems in place, very offensive content including cp will likely get posted. This will further make them a pariah to the main stream internet with app stores…
That seems to be what's happening - a hard division between no-sex sites and porn sites, with nothing in between. Apple and Google seem to be driving this, with their no-sex policies. Verizon, having acquired Tumblr, had a problem. Their own "Verizon Smart Family"[1] censoring system would now be blocking their own site. [1] https://www.verizonwireless.com/support/verizon-smart-family...
Seems like it could increase the barrier of entry significantly while simultaneously giving access to new, less saturated markets?
Sounds like crazy talk, but why has porn suddenly become such a big deal?
Even before internet, porn has been readily accessible for decades, so why does it suddenly become a problem big enough that companies seems willing to loose their entire business to filter out a specific class of content?
The only reasonable explanation is that they are seizing the opportunity, one possibly created on purpose, to enact realignment to new markets without getting all the flak themselves.
Re: Tumblr refugees trying to save its NSFW content
#50Earlier quoted context omitted.
Have you read My Secret Life? Let's just say there was a lot of sex in the Victorian era.
Have you seen all the kids around? Let’s just say there has always been a lot of sex. What changes is the discussion around it.