Live data from Hacker News

Tumblr refugees trying to save its NSFW content

fastcompany.com

41–50 of 66 posts

Re: Tumblr refugees trying to save its NSFW content

#41
post #27

The issue they are going to run into is that they are automatically going to be labeled a porn site. As such they will automatically lose the top tier of advertisers and payment processors. In addition, because they are new and probably won’t have the filtering systems in place, very offensive content including cp will likely get posted. This will further make them a pariah to the main stream internet with app stores…

Tumblr was pretty terrible at handling CP reports. Like, I reported someone who posted sexually explicit photos supposedly of themself whilst admitting they were underage, and it took two months for Tumblr to send a form message saying they were looking into it and might or might not do something.

This is not going to be a popular comment, but it seems like the main problems in that situation are poor parenting and the harsh criminalization of willful adolescent behavior as "child" "pornography".

Re: Tumblr refugees trying to save its NSFW content

#42
post #38
post #33

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Have you seen all the kids around? Let’s just say there has always been a lot of sex. What changes is the discussion around it.

studies show that kids today have less sex.

As compared to 30 years ago. if you follow the graph on the article that I assume you are referring to that was on the front page a few weeks ago, the number of sexual partners in the 1900s was 2-3. Its predicted that number of sexual partners will be 8 for this generation compared to last generations 9. Not a big jump in my perview.

Re: Tumblr refugees trying to save its NSFW content

#43

They should name the new platform Relbmut (inverse of Tumbler).

Actually, I'm kind of surprised Tumbler is trying to get rid of the all content instead of moving it to some separate "Porn Tumbler" instance. Sounds like there could be additional revenue stream coming out of that kind of stuff...

Re: Tumblr refugees trying to save its NSFW content

#45
post #13

It's interesting to see Tumblr described in many articles/forums as primarily for pornography. Tumblr has been the biggest user acquisition channel (and a free one, at that) for my startup, which has nothing to do with pornography. We've gained tens of thousands of users in a few days from a single user post, and several user posts have accumulated 50,000+ notes. This is all thanks to the strong accessibility groups…

Yeah , but how do you think these users got into tumblr in the first place?

I got into Tumblr because I wanted to follow my favorite author.

The content you see on Tumblr is determined by who you follow. If you use Tumblr and only see porn, it's because you're only looking for porn.

Re: Tumblr refugees trying to save its NSFW content

#46
post #20
post #11

That's cute. The Tumblr Refugees don't think that Twitter is censored.

It’s not. The only caveats are that you have to mark porn as porn, and you’re not allowed to get paid for it. Source: https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/xwavkq/j

Twitter absolutely shadowbans sex workers from search results.

Re: Tumblr refugees trying to save its NSFW content

#47

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Via subreddit rules. If you link your work and then say “I made this” you get criticized for self promotion. You almost always need a 3rd party to introduce your work.

The rules are actually global, not subreddit based. If more than 10% of your posts are OC you can be banned. >You should submit from a variety of sources (a general rule of thumb is that 10% or less of your posting and conversation should link to your own content), talk to people in the comments (and not just on your own links), and generally be a good member of the community.

That's not the case at all, reddiquette is not the same as rules, they are more just community hopes and dreams.

In fact Reddit now by default asks if content is "OC" (original content) or not on posts.

Re: Tumblr refugees trying to save its NSFW content

#48
post #38

Earlier quoted context omitted.

studies show that kids today have less sex.

As compared to 30 years ago. if you follow the graph on the article that I assume you are referring to that was on the front page a few weeks ago, the number of sexual partners in the 1900s was 2-3. Its predicted that number of sexual partners will be 8 for this generation compared to last generations 9. Not a big jump in my perview.

the socioeconomic situation and religion was way too different in the 1900s to compare. The shift in attitudes since the 90s on the other hand is remarkably large

https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2018/12/the-sex...

Re: Tumblr refugees trying to save its NSFW content

#49
post #36

The issue they are going to run into is that they are automatically going to be labeled a porn site. As such they will automatically lose the top tier of advertisers and payment processors. In addition, because they are new and probably won’t have the filtering systems in place, very offensive content including cp will likely get posted. This will further make them a pariah to the main stream internet with app stores…

That seems to be what's happening - a hard division between no-sex sites and porn sites, with nothing in between. Apple and Google seem to be driving this, with their no-sex policies. Verizon, having acquired Tumblr, had a problem. Their own "Verizon Smart Family"[1] censoring system would now be blocking their own site. [1] https://www.verizonwireless.com/support/verizon-smart-family...

What if companies that want to expand globally actually want to be forbidden to show any 'objectionable' content. They don't really want to do it themselves, so they work to get it mandated?

Seems like it could increase the barrier of entry significantly while simultaneously giving access to new, less saturated markets?

Sounds like crazy talk, but why has porn suddenly become such a big deal?

Even before internet, porn has been readily accessible for decades, so why does it suddenly become a problem big enough that companies seems willing to loose their entire business to filter out a specific class of content?

The only reasonable explanation is that they are seizing the opportunity, one possibly created on purpose, to enact realignment to new markets without getting all the flak themselves.

Re: Tumblr refugees trying to save its NSFW content

#50
post #33
post #29

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Have you read My Secret Life? Let's just say there was a lot of sex in the Victorian era.

Have you seen all the kids around? Let’s just say there has always been a lot of sex. What changes is the discussion around it.

The Victorian discussion of sexuality was paired with a great deal of licentious behavior.
Post reply on HN