Earlier quoted context omitted.
IIRC for the Audi 5000s it was because the brake and throttle were too close and your foot or floormat frequently got stuck on top of the throttle. People would shift out of park not realizing this and go flying, not any kind of software or security issue.
You are correct it was mechanical, I was just drawing a connection that mandatory recalls exist for issues the auto industry is use to (I.E. mechanical), but nothing exists to track and force updates to software issues (like a CVE database, Perhaps something does exist and I have not heard of it) and have not in the past been the best at software assurance. It is kind of an apples to oranges comparison, but nonethele…
Thieves boosting signal from key fobs inside homes to steal vehicles
251–260 of 449 posts
Re: Thieves boosting signal from key fobs inside homes to steal vehicles
#252Earlier quoted context omitted.
But then my mom would have to dump out her purse every time she wanted to unlock her car.
How does she unlock her front door?
Re: Thieves boosting signal from key fobs inside homes to steal vehicles
#253Earlier quoted context omitted.
Ah, yes, let's put the burden back on the user after we promised them something easier. We should just go back to traditional keys if this is the case.
Please yes. Traditional keys fit on my keyring, can survive the clothes washer, don't unlock doors by accident, can open a car with a dead battery, don't have their own battery issues, and can be brought into restricted work environments where radio transmitters are banned. I want key holes in all doors. I want to insert a key to start the car.
Re: Thieves boosting signal from key fobs inside homes to steal vehicles
#254The article recommends putting your fob upstairs or as far away as possible, but that seems like false security. What's considered a safe distance? How far away can they pick up the signal?
Or you know, maybe put a button on the fob.
Re: Thieves boosting signal from key fobs inside homes to steal vehicles
#255If the speed of light is to fast, maybe using sound could work.
Re: Thieves boosting signal from key fobs inside homes to steal vehicles
#256Re: Thieves boosting signal from key fobs inside homes to steal vehicles
#257Re: Thieves boosting signal from key fobs inside homes to steal vehicles
#258Re: Thieves boosting signal from key fobs inside homes to steal vehicles
#259Earlier quoted context omitted.
I disagree. A physical switch on the key itself which opened a circuit to the decryption key would mean the key would need to physically be in the possession of the driver.
This eliminates all of the convenience of keyless entry/start.
Re: Thieves boosting signal from key fobs inside homes to steal vehicles
#260Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm not sure if this is a joke about old keys being better, but I'd argue you could have the benefits of new keys and old keys combined if you just made it so that new keys have to be inserted into some compartment inside of cars, where they are authenticated by those cars. You can imagine a fob with a USB that has a different authentication code than the wireless one it sends out, and unless the USB is plugged into…
Yes, I was making a joke, but I was also semi-serious. I personally wouldn't mind that the car unlocks based on the fob's proximity, but requires insertion of the key for ignition. I currently drive a 2009 car with the usual key fob and my biggest issue with it is not having to insert it to start the car, but unlocking the doors while my hands are full. Once I'm seated in the driver's seat I'm not carrying anything a…
The old ignition hole was the perfect solution. You had a dedicated spot for your keys, you always knew where they are, were unlikely to forget them in the car, and it also happened to start your engine. Perfect